(Senior) Medical Science Liaison (Taipei City, Taiwan, Taipei City)
About this opportunity
The Position
Focusing on scientific communication on Respirology and Inflammation (including Pulmonary Fibrosis and Bronchiectasis) for Boehringer Ingelheim -related products & new indications.
To provide scientific information to SEs/HCPs(scientific expert/ healthcare professionals ), to implement medical programs, and support medical/scientific needs of SEs/HCPs in assigned therapeutic area. To provide scientific information to SEs/HCPs(scientific expert/ healthcare professionals ), to implement medical programs, and support medical/scientific needs of SEs/HCPs in assigned therapeutic area.
Task & Responsibilities:
Effective and scientific communication with SEs to provide the most wanted and up-to-date scientific information of Boehringer Ingelheim products and related therapeutic area including response to external enquiries through credible and clear non-promotional way
Develop and implement KOL management plan, and build up scientific network with KOL
Provide scientific support to medical/marketing activities by facilitating scientific presentations and medical education programs
Execute the plan of data dissemination & publication and works with key scientific experts
Implement medical plan and activities, e.g, advisory board meeting and CME/SEM(continue medical education/scientific expert meeting)
Deliver up-to-date Boehringer Ingelheim products and related therapeutic area information to marketing and sales force and provide training in a regular basis
Coordinate all local clinical trials programs (e.g., Phase IV studies, IIS(investigator initiated studies), NIS(non-investigate study), PMS(post marketing surveillance), registry, CUP (Compassionate Use program)etc.
Identifies opportunities to improve methodology and provide practical solutions to Medical Affairs, and may work with a team to implement these improvements and solutions.
Requirements:
Master in health science, PharmD, PhD, MD
Minimum 2 years working experience of pharma industry or clinical practice
Preferred candidates are those who reside in southern Taiwan or are open to KEE engagement activities mainly in the southern region of Taiwan
Good knowledge of clinical study methodology, study design, data review and analysis, publication processes
Summarize the medical information and conduct medical input
Highly medical project management skills to deliver on complex tasks within timeframe and milestones
Good communication skills both in English and Chinese; Ability to communicate clinical and non-clinical technical information effectively
Good presentation skills
Project management ability
Want to learn more?
Visit www.boehringer-ingelheim.com
Position Area
Medical
Position Area
Taiwan, Taipei
Organization
TW – Boehringer Ingelheim Taiwan Ltd
Schedule
Full time
]]>
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Medical Affairs role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 257 comparable Senior Medical Affairs roles across 76 biopharma companies.
Salary context
105 of 257 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 257 comparable roles
+ 19 more countries
Seniority mix
257 of 257 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
76 of 257 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.