About this opportunity
Job Description Summary
-Highly skilled and experienced laboratory professional who contributes by performing analytical release testing, investigational support, research support, and stability testing.
Job Description
Major accountabilities:
OOx/Deviation handling.
CAPA definition -KPI trending -Ensure all activities in compliance with cGxP, incl. data integrity review and approval of analytical data / tests (analytical release) Stability -Stability testing (Projects) – protocol preparation, evaluation, report preparation.
Reporting (Stability plan preparation, trend analysis, evaluation) -Performance of Stability studies, protocols and comparative reports for supplier qualification -Review and approval of analytical tests (analytical release) -Microbiological QC -Perform Microbiological testing of materials and utilities, environmental and personnel monitoring -Provide expert Support for site qualification and validation activities -Maintain and calibrate equipment incl. plan preparation -Support in supplier qualification -Trending and analysis of KPI/KQI -Support sample planning and sampling execution -Reporting of technical complaints / adverse events / special case scenarios related to Sandoz products within 24 hours of receipt -Distribution of marketing samples (where applicable)
Key performance indicators:
The relevant KPIs that are defined in the Quality Control areas apply: e.g. analytical lead times -Timely and GMP-compliant analysis & documentation of the results.
Error rate: Number of OOS (analysis errors) related to the number of analyzes -No complaints about official inspections.
Individual performance is assessed using the PMP performance dialog together with the manager
Minimum Requirements:
Work Experience:
Functional Breadth.
3-5years experience in Pharma/Manufacturing sector in analytical lab in.
Collaborating across boundaries.
A GMP environment/equivalent.
Skills:
Continuous Learning.
Dealing With Ambiguity.
Decision Making Skills.
Gxp.
Industry Standards.
Laboratory Equipment.
Laboratory Excellence.
Quality Control (QC) Testing.
Quality Control Sampling.
Self-Awareness.
Technological Expertise.
Total Quality Management.
Languages:
English.
Skills Desired
Continued Learning, Dealing With Ambiguity, Decision Making Skills, Gxp, Industry Standards, Laboratory Equipment, Laboratory Excellence, Quality Control (Qc) Testing, Quality Control Sampling, Self-Awareness, Technological Expertise, Total Quality Management
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Quality role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 1045 comparable Quality roles across 127 biopharma companies.
Salary context
188 of 1045 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 1045 comparable roles
+ 48 more countries
Seniority mix
462 of 1045 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
2 of 1045 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Matched on job function only -- seniority, specialty, and location weren't confirmed as aligned.
Matched on job function only -- seniority, specialty, and location weren't confirmed as aligned.
Matched on job function only -- seniority, specialty, and location weren't confirmed as aligned.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.