Quality Investigation Approver – Quality Assurance
Notify me about similar jobsAbout this opportunity
Key Responsibilities
Independently review, challenge, and approve deviation, non-conformance, OOS/OOT, complaint, environmental, microbiological, and manufacturing investigations to ensure scientific robustness and regulatory compliance.
Evaluate investigation strategies to ensure thorough fact-finding, evidence gathering, and identification of scientifically justified root causes.
Assess data integrity, documentation accuracy, and investigation completeness to ensure conclusions are supported by objective evidence.
Review the application of investigation tools including 5-Why Analysis, DMAIC, Fishbone Analysis, Fault Tree Analysis, Human Error Reduction tools, and Risk Assessment methodologies.
Challenge unsupported assumptions, weak rationales, and bias to drive fact-based decision making.
Assess product quality, patient safety, process, compliance, and business risks associated with investigation events.
Review and approve CAPAs to ensure actions are proportionate, effective, sustainable, and aligned with identified root causes.
Ensure compliance with site procedures, Quality Management System requirements, current GMP expectations, and global regulatory requirements.
Drive investigation quality and on-time closure through effective collaboration with Manufacturing, Microbiology, Engineering, Validation, Quality Control, and Technical Services teams.
Identify investigation trends, recurring events, systemic gaps, and opportunities for continuous improvement.
Provide coaching and mentoring to investigation owners on root cause analysis, scientific rationale development, technical writing, and investigation best practices.
Support internal audits, regulatory inspections, customer audits, and remediation activities related to investigations and CAPAs.
Key Deliverables
High-quality investigations approved within established timelines.
Improved effectiveness and robustness of root cause identification.
Reduction in repeat deviations and recurring quality events.
Enhanced CAPA effectiveness and sustainability.
Improved compliance with GMP, data integrity, and regulatory expectations.
Strengthened inspection readiness and reduction in investigation-related observations.
Improved investigation closure cycle time without compromising quality.
Development of investigation review best practices and lessons learned repository.
Improved quality culture through effective coaching and reviewer engagement.
Education Qualification
B.Pharm, M.Pharm, M.Sc. (Microbiology/Chemistry), Biotechnology, Pharmaceutical Sciences
Minimum 6-10 years of experience in Quality Assurance, Quality Control, Sterile Manufacturing, or Investigation Management.
Certification in Six Sigma, Lean, Risk Management, Human Performance, or Investigation Excellence preferred.
Required Skills
Quality Assurance
Quality Management Systems (QMS)
Deviation Management
Root Cause Analysis
Investigation Review and Approval
Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA) Management
Risk Assessment and Risk Management
Data Integrity
GMP Compliance
Regulatory Compliance (USFDA, MHRA, EMA, TGA, CDSCO)
Audit Readiness
Technical Writing and Documentation Review
Sterile Manufacturing Knowledge
Quality Systems Oversight
Transferable Skills to Develop
Critical Thinking and Scientific Reasoning
Risk-Based Decision Making
Investigative Interviewing Techniques
Systems Thinking
Problem Solving and Analytical Skills
Data Analysis and Trending
Stakeholder Management
Influencing Without Authority
Effective Communication and Coaching
Time Management and Prioritization
Key Investigator & Reviewer Competencies
Ability to distinguish symptoms from true root causes.
Ability to identify investigation gaps and challenge weak justifications.
Strong attention to detail and data review capabilities.
Capability to evaluate investigation completeness and scientific validity.
Strong understanding of human error, behavioral factors, and organizational contributors.
Ability to objectively assess product quality and patient impact.
Fact-based decision making with strong compliance orientation.
Expertise in evaluating CAPA adequacy and effectiveness.
Strong technical writing and report review skills.
Sound judgment and decision-making abilities during complex investigations
Pfizer is an equal opportunity employer and complies with all applicable equal employment opportunity legislation in each jurisdiction in which it operates.
To learn more about acceptable and prohibited uses of AI during the recruitment process, please review our candidate AI-use guidelines available on Pfizer Careers .
Quality Assurance and Control
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Quality role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 1107 comparable Quality roles across 134 biopharma companies.
Salary context
212 of 1107 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 1107 comparable roles
+ 44 more countries
Seniority mix
549 of 1107 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
2 of 1107 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.