QC Analyst (上海, 中国)
Notify me about similar jobsWe couldn't confirm this posting on Boehringer Ingelheim's site in our latest checks -- see current similar openings below.
About this opportunity
关于质量团队：
我们负责药品质量管理，监督相关质量管理规范的执行，维护良好的质量管理体系。将药品注册的有关安全、有效和质量可控的所有要求，系统地贯彻到药品生产、控制及产品放行、贮存、发运的全过程中，确保所生产的药品符合预定用途和注册要求。其中，质量控制部负责原辅料、包装材料、成品等检验和放行，新产品上市的分析方法转移。确保QC活动符合国家相关法规、GMP规范及勃林格公司的相关规定。
岗位描述：
在公司管理规范和cGMP法规要求下进行物料及产品的分析检测、偏差调查、设备及试剂等的管理，确保产品质量符合BI标准操作规程、cGMP法规、产品注册标准等要求；严格执行并持续改进各项标准要求以具有竞争力的成本保持产品的高质量水平。
工作职责：
按要求进行原辅料、包装材料、待包装产品、成品和稳定性样品的取样和检测工作，以确保按时完成样品的分析任务
按要求定期更新相关检验文件，以符合GMP规范和公司要求
按要求实施实验室设备的确认和维护保养,以确保顺利进行所有检测任务
定期参加公司内外部培训及相关活动
基于业务进行项目管理，以及对实验室管理和检验流程进行持续精益提升
职位要求：
本科及以上学历，食品发酵、发酵工程、药学、微生物学或生命科学相关专业；具备微生物学相关课程学习背景或微生物分析、检测实验经验者优先考虑
良好的问题分析和解决能力
良好的沟通组织能力
良好的抗压能力
良好的团队合作精神
良好的英文听说读写能力
良好的电脑操作水平，如Excel，PPT和Word
良好的时间管理能力
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Quality role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 1502 comparable Quality roles across 147 biopharma companies.
Salary context
261 of 1502 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 1502 comparable roles
+ 48 more countries
Seniority mix
731 of 1502 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
3 of 1502 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Currently open similar roles
This posting is closed, but here are live openings closest to it -- ranked by similarity, not by how well you'd qualify for them.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
Or follow a whole field: get every new Quality job in China, and choose locations and companies.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.