Medical Information Associate
About this opportunity
The Medical Information Associate ensures the delivery of high-quality, accurate, timely and compliant medical information to healthcare professionals, in line with local regulations. The role supports non-promotional, on-demand scientific exchange in line with Novartis standards, local regulations and global medical governance requirements. Operating within the Medical Governance, Evidence & Operations pillar, the role contributes to scientific credibility, insight generation and consistent medical execution across therapeutic areas. The Medical Information Associate owns the execution of medical information activities while aligning closely with Medical Governance, Evidence Generation and Medical Operations. The role acts as a key interface between external medical enquiries and internal medical strategy, without holding final governance or approval authority. The role also supports the scientific review of promotional/non-promotional content to ensure accuracy, balance and compliance, while maintaining clear separation from promotional decision-making and final approval responsibilities.
Key responsibilities:Deliver accurate, balanced and timely responses to unsolicited medical enquiries.Develop, adapt and maintain medical information responses aligned with approved scientific data, current evidence and safety updates.Conduct literature searches and critically evaluate scientific data to support high-quality medical responses.Ensure scientific neutrality, non-promotional communication and compliance with local regulations, global standards, SOPs and medical governance requirements.Document enquiries, responses and scientific rationale in medical information systems, ensuring data quality, traceability and audit readiness.Review promotional and non-promotional content for scientific accuracy, consistency and alignment with approved data.Capture and share aggregated insights from medical enquiries to help identify recurring questions and evidence gaps.Collaborate with Medical, Evidence Generation, Medical Operations, Field Medical, Commercial, Marketing and Compliance stakeholders.Support continuous improvement of medical information processes and digital solutions.Requirements:Bachelor’s degree in Life Sciences or a relevant healthcare discipline, such as pharmacy, nursing or medicine.At least one year of experience in a healthcare setting.Strong scientific and medical knowledge.Proficiency in standard databases and systems used for medical information activities.Excellent customer service, communication, English reading and writing skills.A detail-oriented mindset with a strong commitment to scientific accuracy, quality and compliance.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Medical Affairs role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 310 comparable Associate Medical Affairs roles across 75 biopharma companies.
Salary context
58 of 310 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 310 comparable roles
+ 37 more countries
Seniority mix
310 of 310 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
87 of 310 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
Or follow a whole field: get every new Medical Affairs job in South Korea, and choose locations and companies.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.