Director, Procurement Technology Excellence
About this opportunity
Role purpose
The Director, Procurement Technology Excellence & Deployment leads the Procurement Technology team and is accountable for the effective operation, governance and evolution of Procurement’s technology platforms.
The role owns Procurement-side platform operations, release and change governance, cross-platform integrity, vendor management and the supervised deployment of externally purchased technology and AI products. It co-leads the Procurement Technology Roadmap and ensures changes and deployments align with the agreed architecture and enterprise standards.
For new deployments, the role provides Procurement Technology leadership, governance and delivery supervision through an appropriately resourced project or programme structure, with signed-off BAU capacity, clear priorities and an agreed delivery model. The role partners with the IT Business Partner from the point a potential new technology need or opportunity is identified. New software, SaaS, AI capabilities, material platform extensions, pilots and PoCs must follow applicable IT architecture, security, data, integration and technology governance. The role must not independently commit Procurement to a technology solution, initiate substantive supplier solution design, or enter into software/licensing commitments without appropriate IT involvement and approvals. Procurement Technology owns business/platform requirements and operational outcomes; technical architecture and engineering accountabilities remain with the relevant IT functions.
Ensure continuous alignment with the IT business partner, Sourcing and Contracting Excellence and Procurement process owners.
The role is consulted on new AI capabilities for Procurement. It is not accountable for AI governance or for the creation and deployment of internally built AI agents.
Key accountabilities:
1. Team leadership and portfolio management
Lead the team, set priorities and ways of working, and allocate capacity across BAU, releases, controls, improvements and deployments.
Maintain a transparent portfolio of commitments, dependencies, risks and resources, protecting BAU stability when new initiatives start.
Build team capability, document critical knowledge, and support development and succession.
Report on delivery, platform health and capacity; escalate resource and priority conflicts with options.
2. BAU operations and platform ownership
Own the Procurement-side operating model for designated platforms, keeping them stable, controlled and scalable, with clear decision rights for configuration, releases, integrations and vendor support.
Oversee platform health, defects, technical debt, risks and lifecycle plans (upgrades, renewals, rationalisation, replacement).
Manage the change-request portfolio (prioritisation, impact assessment, testing, release coordination) in close collaboration with IT and process owners.
Ensure production changes have requirements, testing evidence, approvals and audit evidence.
3. Supervision of externally provided technology and AI deployments
Each material deployment should have an approved business case, executive sponsor and business owner, defined success measures, a named project lead, a resourced cross-functional team, confirmed funding (including transition-to-BAU costs) and agreed governance. The role:
Provides leadership, oversight and design direction, and confirms the delivery model, governance and resources fit the scope.
Supervises delivery through stage gates, design reviews and readiness assessments, aligning the provider, IT, process owners and control functions.
Oversees key decisions on fit, configuration, integration, data, testing, cutover and go-live, challenging unnecessary customisation.
Recommends go, conditional-go or no-go and ensures transfer to a sustainable BAU owner.
Resourcing boundary: The role is not expected to act as sponsor, programme manager, architect, analyst, tester, change lead and administrator at once; these activities sit with assigned resources. Material deployment commitments should not be added to BAU without assessing capacity, priorities and additional support.
4. Procurement Technology Roadmap
Co-lead the multi-year roadmap with Technology & Insights leadership and Procurement and IT stakeholders, sequencing platform, data, integration, automation and external AI capabilities.
Support investment cases, annual planning, vendor evaluations and lifecycle decisions, with clear status of each initiative (approved, funded, under evaluation, not prioritised).
Assess resource demand, IT dependencies and BAU ownership early; advise on resequencing, deferral or separate resourcing.
5. Architecture alignment and AI capability consultation
Act as Procurement technology domain lead with Enterprise, Solution, Data and Integration Architects; ensure changes, deployments and optimisation align with the target architecture and check existing platforms before adding solutions.
Flag architectural risks (duplication, conflicting data, unsupported customisation, fragile integrations) and long-term cost and technical-debt implications.
Be Consulted, not Accountable, on new AI capabilities: assess fit with the existing estate (complement, overlap, replace), dependencies, vendor, cost and roadmap impact, and advise on supportability, build-versus-buy and BAU readiness.
6. Optimisation and continuous improvement support
Provide platform and architecture expertise to initiatives led by Procurement Operations or process owners, helping decide between process change, existing functionality, configuration, integration or a new solution.
Support backlog prioritisation; ensure each initiative has a clear owner, outcome and operating model, and avoid unmanaged technical debt.
7. Vendor management
Lead operational governance with strategic technology providers: monitor performance, commitments, roadmaps and risks, and manage senior escalations.
Support renewals, expansions, commercial decisions, replacement and exit planning, retaining sufficient knowledge and control of configuration, integrations and data.
8. Risk, controls and financial management
Maintain proportionate governance, involve Security, Privacy, Risk and Compliance where required, and escalate material risks with impact, mitigation, decision needed and owner.
SoX controls for which the system controllers needs to perform regular testing and share evidence in a dedicated app.
Support budget planning and oversight of external spend; ensure funding covers delivery and operating costs, not only licences; maintain audit evidence for material decisions.
Key decision rights
Return requests lacking ownership, requirements, priority or architecture alignment, and require architecture and technical review.
Require a credible, funded and resourced delivery model before accepting deployment supervision; escalate and recommend resources, resequencing, reduced scope or deferral where capacity is insufficient.
Recommend go, conditional-go or no-go; stop or defer releases with insufficient readiness; require a BAU owner, support model and funding before accepting a solution into service.
Requirements
Essential
Strong Program implementation credibility.
5+ years applicable Procurement or Finance Operations experience
Bachelor's Degree required, advanced degree (such as an MBA, MS, JD) a plus
Demonstrated leadership / management and business partnership skills
Strong communication, cross functional collaboration and influencing skills
Exceptional track record driving procurement's value proposition
Supplier Relationship Management and Development experience
Ability to leverage a range of influencing techniques
Proven ability to manage change
Strong analytical and financial skills
Ability to work in highly complex and fluid environment
Desirable
Pharmaceutical Procurement experience
CIPS or equivalent
Experience in pharmaceutical or other regulated industry
Experience using spend analytics and source-to-pay systems
Date Posted
10-lis-2026
Closing Date
23-lis-2026
AstraZeneca embraces diversity and equality of opportunity. We are committed to building an inclusive and diverse team representing all backgrounds, with as wide a range of perspectives as possible, and harnessing industry-leading skills. We believe that the more inclusive we are, the better our work will be. We welcome and consider applications to join our team from all qualified candidates, regardless of their characteristics. We comply with all applicable laws and regulations on non-discrimination in employment (and recruitment), as well as work authorization and employment eligibility verification requirements.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Procurement role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 16 comparable Director Procurement roles across 10 biopharma companies.
Salary context
6 of 16 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 16 comparable roles
+ 3 more countries
Seniority mix
16 of 16 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
0 of 16 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
No peers with a known therapeutic area yet.
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
Or follow a whole field: get every new Procurement job in Poland, and choose locations and companies.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.