About this opportunity
At Johnson & Johnson, we believe health is everything. Our strength in healthcare innovation empowers us to build a world where complex diseases are prevented, treated, and cured, where treatments are smarter and less invasive, and solutions are personal. Through our expertise in Innovative Medicine and MedTech, we are uniquely positioned to innovate across the full spectrum of healthcare solutions today to deliver the breakthroughs of tomorrow, and profoundly impact health for humanity. Learn more at https://www.jnj.com
Job Function:
Marketing
Job Sub Function:
Product Management
Job Category:
Professional
All Job Posting Locations:
Nanning, Guangxi, China
Job Description:
1、管理区域内医院自主建立房颤规范化诊疗路径进程。
2、与当地学会协作，搭建学术平台，推广房颤规范化诊疗行业经验并形成行业共识。
1、管理区域内医院自主建立房颤规范化诊疗路径进程。
2、与当地学会协作，搭建学术平台，推广房颤规范化诊疗行业经验并形成行业共识。
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Marketing role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 870 comparable Marketing roles across 153 biopharma companies.
Salary context
266 of 870 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 870 comparable roles
+ 55 more countries
Seniority mix
698 of 870 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
176 of 870 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.