Regulatory Affairs Intern (Amman, Jordan)
About this opportunity
We are IMETA
ROPU IMETA is a Regional Operating Unit consisting of 6 mid-sized Operating Units: India, Turkey, Southern Africa (South Africa & Sub Sahara Africa) Northeast & West Africa, Near East & UAE, Saudi Arabia, Gulf & East Africa (SAGEA).
IMETA is home to more than 47 nationalities. We are a powerhouse of talent, and we work together to ensure that we grow, nurture, and retain our talent. Uniting and working together is the key to our success.
The Opportunity
We are looking for a motivated individual to join our Near East & UAE Regulatory Affairs team based in Amman, Jordan as an Regulatory Affairs Intern for 3 months.
Key responsibilities:
Support the preparation and organization of product dossiers for eCTD baseline submissions
Review approved regulatory documentation and verify completeness against approved records
Retrieve, compile, index, and reconcile regulatory documents from internal databases and archives
Assist in tracking dossier gaps and following up with internal stakeholders to obtain missing documents
Support the review of documents prior to eCTD publishing activities
Maintain submission trackers and project dashboards to monitor progress against timelines
Coordinate with Regulatory Affairs colleagues to ensure documents are accurately filed and version-controlled
Assist in preparing submission-related documentation, and supporting materials
Participate in data entry, document QC, and metadata verification activities
Qualification:
Recent graduate in Pharmacy or life sciences
Basic understanding of pharmaceutical regulatory affairs
Familiarity with CTD/eCTD structure is an advantage
Strong analytical, organizational, and problem-solving abilities
Willingness to learn and develop professionally
Ability to manage projects and follow up effectively
Capable of working independently and collaboratively
What happens Next?
We are looking forward to receiving your application! We will then have a look at your CV. If we see a match, we will invite you for a screening interview.
SPL Screening:
In order to comply with applicable export control laws, Boehringer Ingelheim periodically screens business relations (including job applicants) against sanctioned party lists (“SPL”). These checks may be performed by Boehringer Ingelheim or by any of its Affiliates. You acknowledge that Boehringer Ingelheim and/or its Affiliates will screen you against SPL and that for this purpose your personal data may be processed in relevant databases, including databases of third-party vendors that perform SPL screening for or on behalf of Boehringer Ingelheim or its Affiliates which may be located or accessible outside the EU. Boehringer Ingelheim is committed to ensuring an adequate level of protection of your personal data.
]]>
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Regulatory Affairs role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 21 comparable Intern/Fellow/Postdoc Regulatory Affairs roles across 10 biopharma companies.
Salary context
2 of 21 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 21 comparable roles
+ 5 more countries
Seniority mix
21 of 21 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
0 of 21 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
No peers with a known therapeutic area yet.
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.