[MedTech] メドテック エデュケーション プロフェッショナルエデュケーション EP&NV エレクトロフィジオロジー スタッフ
Notify me about similar jobsAbout this opportunity
At Johnson & Johnson, we believe health is everything. Our strength in healthcare innovation empowers us to build a world where complex diseases are prevented, treated, and cured, where treatments are smarter and less invasive, and solutions are personal. Through our expertise in Innovative Medicine and MedTech, we are uniquely positioned to innovate across the full spectrum of healthcare solutions today to deliver the breakthroughs of tomorrow, and profoundly impact health for humanity. Learn more at jnj.com .
As guided by Our Credo, Johnson & Johnson is responsible to our employees who work with us throughout the world. We provide an inclusive work environment where each person is considered as an individual. At Johnson & Johnson, we respect the diversity and dignity of our employees and recognize their merit.
Job Function:
Medical Affairs Group
Job Sub Function:
Professional Medical Education
Job Category:
Professional
All Job Posting Locations:
Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan
Job Description:
医療従事者向けの教育プログラムの企画・運営を通じて、事業成長および製品の適正安全使用に貢献いただくポジションです。
営業・マーケティング・メディカル部門およびグローバルチームと連携しながら、年間を通じた教育戦略の立案と実行をリードしていただきます。
1) 医療従事者向け教育プログラムの企画・運営
- 事業戦略や顧客ニーズを踏まえた教育プログラムの企画・実行
- 対面およびデジタルを組み合わせた学習体験（Learning Journey）の設計
- 営業・マーケティング部門と連携した教育施策の推進
- 学会や新製品導入スケジュールを考慮した年間教育計画の策定・運営
2) 医療分野の専門家（Faculty）との関係構築・ネットワーク開発
- 医療分野における著名な専門家や外部講師との関係構築
- 学会や教育活動を通じた講師ネットワークの拡大
- 将来の講師候補となる若手医療従事者の発掘・育成支援
3) コンプライアンスの遵守
- 医療業界に関わる関連法規および社内規程を遵守した業務遂行
- 高い倫理観を持ち、適正なビジネス活動を推進
4) グローバルチームとの協働
- APAC（アジア太平洋地域）およびグローバルチームとの連携
- ベストプラクティスや市場動向に関する情報共有
- グローバル施策の日本市場への展開支援
(経験・知識・スキル)
- 医療機器業界またはヘルスケア業界における営業、マーケティング、または教育関連業務の経験
- クロスファンクショナルな環境でのプロジェクト推進経験
- 社内外のステークホルダーとの関係構築・コミュニケーション能力
(望ましい)
- 不整脈治療領域（Electrophysiology：EP）に関する知識または業務経験
- 医療従事者向け教育・トレーニングプログラムの企画・運営経験
- 英語を用いた業務経験・海外ステークホルダーとの連携
Required Skills:
Preferred Skills:
Business Behavior, Business Savvy, Channel Partner Enablement, Execution Focus, Goal Attainment, Innovation, Learning Materials Development, Medical Affairs, Medical Communications, New Program Development, Partner Onboarding, Project Management, Technical Credibility, Training Delivery Methods, Training Needs Analysis (TNA), Training People
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Medical Affairs role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 1124 comparable Medical Affairs roles across 161 biopharma companies.
Salary context
285 of 1124 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 1124 comparable roles
+ 50 more countries
Seniority mix
688 of 1124 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
382 of 1124 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.