About this opportunity
~彼らの医療専門家と科学的な関与を駆動します。臨床および教育戦略を実施し、未承諾の医療に関する問い合わせに対応する。
Major Accountabilities~ 支援提供のため特定の医療ニーズが確認された場合、ME を関与させる機会の特定を含め、ME/主要アカウントの適切な特定/マッピングを確保。 ~ 〜医療専門家とのエンゲージメントプランを作成・実施して、医療専門家と協力して国の戦略に沿った効果的な優先順位を決定する。 ~ MEからの未承諾の情報要求への対応 ~ 〜インパクトのある見解を医療専門家から集め、医療戦略の伝達・形成を行う ~ 〜ノバルティスの臨床研究プログラムをサポート、治験の最適化、臨床業務と連携して現場の研究をサポートし、科学分野の教育を行う。 ~ 〜治験責任医師の要請に応じて治験責任医師主導の試験（IIT）プロセスを促進する ~ 疾病分野や製品トレーニングに関して現場の医療情報源としての役割を果たす ~ 受領後24時間以内にノバルティス製品に関連する技術的苦情/有害事象/特殊事例の報告 ~ マーケティングサンプルの配布(該当する場合)Key Performance Indicators~彼らの医療専門家と科学的な関与を駆動します。臨床および教育戦略を実施し、未承諾の医療に関する問い合わせに対応する。Work Experience~オペレーション管理と実行~境界を越えての協働Skills~生物統計学~ブレーンストーミング~臨床実践~臨床研究~臨床試験報告書~疾病管理~医薬品開発~教育~キーアカウント管理~医療情報~医学研究~メディカルライティング~Microsoft Exchange Server(マイクロソフト・エクスチェンジ・サーバー)~NPD(新製品開発)~患者ケア~プレゼンテーションスキル~科学的な支援Language英語
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Medical Affairs role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 1681 comparable Medical Affairs roles across 177 biopharma companies.
Salary context
380 of 1681 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 1681 comparable roles
+ 56 more countries
Seniority mix
1029 of 1681 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
597 of 1681 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
Or follow a whole field: get every new Medical Science Liaison job in Japan, and choose locations and companies.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.