Medical Advisor
About this opportunity
Position Purpose
Provide Scientific & Medical Expertise: Support medical strategy and execution for pipeline products in Specialty Care and Internal Medicine, ensuring compliance and scientific integrity.
Enable Launch Readiness: Contribute to pre-launch planning, medical education, and evidence generation activities for new products.
Drive External Engagement: Act as a credible scientific resource for healthcare professionals and stakeholders, strengthening partnerships and advancing patient outcomes.
Primary Responsibilities
Medical Strategy Support
Implement country medical plans for pipeline assets, aligned with global/regional strategy and local regulations.
Scientific Communication
Deliver accurate, balanced scientific information to HCPs; support advisory boards, congresses, and educational initiatives.
Evidence Generation
Coordinate local RWE, IITs, and post-marketing studies in compliance with SOPs and regulatory requirements.
Launch Preparation
Assist in medical readiness for new product launches, including KOL mapping, training, and medical content development.
Cross-Functional Collaboration
Partner with commercial, regulatory, and clinical teams to ensure integrated execution of medical activities.
Compliance & Governance
Review promotional and non-promotional materials; ensure adherence to OPPI, CDSCO, and internal standards.
Insight Gathering
Capture and communicate medical insights to inform strategy and content updates
Qualifications
MD degree (any field)
4-6 years of Medical Affairs experience
Experience working in a multinational company
Experience with launch, oncology & vaccines
Basic knowledge of pharmaceutical industry, drug discovery, research & development, commercialization, promotion, and applicable policies, procedures, regulations, and guidelines
Knowledge of “pharmaceutical medicine” including clinical pharmacology, medical and paramedical sciences, medicine and medical statistics and relevant Therapeutic Area/Products
Understanding of clinical trial design, methodology, conduct and understanding of interfaces.
Communication skills, both written and verbal (including medical writing and presentation skills)
Good analytical skills and reasoning, and sound medical judgment/decision making
Strong interpersonal skills, internal & external networking and the ability to impact and influence stakeholders
Strong knowledge of AI tools and use cases for the Medical Affairs function
Pfizer is an equal opportunity employer and complies with all applicable equal employment opportunity legislation in each jurisdiction in which it operates.
To learn more about acceptable and prohibited uses of AI during the recruitment process, please review our candidate AI-use guidelines available on Pfizer Careers .
Medical
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Medical Affairs role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 224 comparable Associate Medical Affairs roles across 75 biopharma companies.
Salary context
25 of 224 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 224 comparable roles
+ 35 more countries
Seniority mix
224 of 224 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
54 of 224 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.