Head of Regulatory Affairs Group 1(開発薬事)_ Biopharma
Notify me about similar jobsAbout this opportunity
メルクと一緒に、あなたの力を発揮しよう!
冒険、限界への挑戦、そして発見に焦がれるあなたへ。あなたの大志を、メルクで羽ばたかせましょう!科学とテクノロジーを駆使したイノベーションに情熱を注ぐメルクのスタッフは世界中で活躍中です。ヘルスケア、生命科学、エレクトロニクスの分野で、メルクのソリューションは人々の暮らしをますます豊かなものにしています。あなたとメルクの力を合わせて、大きな夢を抱きましょう。メルクは、人、顧客、患者、そしてこの地球という惑星が共存する豊かな世界の構築に情熱を注いでいます。このためメルクでは、好奇心にあふれた人材を募集中です。メルクと一緒に、想像を超えた世界を開拓しませんか?
患者さんのためにひとつになって団結し、生命の誕生、QOLの向上、命をつなぐサポートをすることか、ヘルスケアにおける私たちの目的です。私たちは、腫瘍学、神経学、不妊治療などの疾患領域において、医薬品、インテリジェント装置、革新的技術を開発します。私たちのチームは、人生のすべてのステージで患者さんを助けるために、情熱と執拗な好奇心を持って6大陸全体で協力して働いています。ヘルスケアチームに入ることは、多様的で包含的、そして柔軟な職場文化の一部となることです。世界中で個人的な能力開発とキャリアアップの素晴らしいチャンスが待ち受けています。
Head of Regulatory Affairs (開発薬事チーム)
Lodation: Japan
Report to: Head of Global Regulatory Affairs Japan
Direct Reports: 5
Your Role:
Develop and execute regulatory affairs (RA) activities from the development to the life cycle management, with collaborative with global and Japan stakeholders. Regulatory Affairs Group 1 Head focuses on the following development activities:
Oversee, manage, mentor, and ensure that Group plans and delivers the regulatory deliverables as the representative of Group, while complying with applicable regulations.
Provides coaching and development opportunities to staff.
Lead RA-related Health Authority (HA) interactions. e.g., PMDA or MHLW interaction
Lead New Drug Application (NDA) and supplementary NDA (sNDA) such as indication expansion, new formulation, etc. Lead preparation of the Japan NDA activities and HA’s review for approval.
Prepare the Japan-CTD regulatory parts such as Approval Application Form, Module 1, etc.
Lead electronic Japanese Package Inserts (J-PI), respond to query, and join artwork activities. Review promotion materials.
Manage Outsourcing vendors as needed.
Represent RA for the SOPs/WI updates and improvement tasks.
Who You Are:
Education and Preferable work experiences:
Extensive experience and knowledge in Regulatory Affairs, especially development activity.
Experiences and knowledge of Collaborating with cross-functional team and global member.
Competencies and skills:
Language: Japanese- native level. English: Able to communicate with global members as J-RA representative.
People management skills
Stakeholder management, Communication/coordination, leadership/ownership skills, strategic consideration and project/risk management skills (e.g., To Clarify regulatory risks and plan/execute minimization/mitigation).
私たちが提供するもの:私たちは、さまざまな背景、視点、人生経験を持つ好奇心旺盛な人々で構成されるグループです。この多様性が卓越性と革新を促進し、科学と技術のリーダーシップを強化すると信じています。私たちは、すべての人が自分のペースで成長し発展するためのアクセスと機会を創出することにコミットしています。何百万もの人々に影響を与え、誰もが人類の進歩を支持できるようにする包括性と帰属感のある文化を築くために私たちに参加してください!
今すぐ応募して、発見を促し、人類の発展を高めることに専念するチームの一員になりましょう!
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Regulatory Affairs role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 407 comparable Regulatory Affairs roles across 100 biopharma companies.
Salary context
116 of 407 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 407 comparable roles
+ 37 more countries
Seniority mix
332 of 407 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
38 of 407 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.