Merck KGaA Posted September 11, 2026

Data Transformation Project Manager_ Life Science

Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan FULL_TIME
Notify me about similar jobs

Merck KGaA is the source of truth for this posting and owns the application process. We surface normalized context and market comparison you won't find on the original listing.

About this opportunity

Your Role:

 

As our Data Transformation Project Manager based in Japan, you will lead the technology modernization of our Life Science Quality and Regulatory operations in Japan, designing scalable system architectures, establishing engineering best practices, and laying the groundwork for future-ready digital infrastructure. You will collaborate closely with local and global teams, acting as the technical anchor for this program.

What you will do:

Design and implement scalable, maintainable IT system architectures suited to the regulatory and quality requirements of our Japan Life Science operations.

Define and enforce engineering standards across software development practices, ensuring solutions are reproducible, secure, and built to last.

Drive code quality through automated testing, structured code reviews, and disciplined Git workflows.

Communicate technical concepts clearly to both engineering teams and non-technical business stakeholders, including Quality and Regulatory functions.

Contribute to the company's broader AI capabilities where applicable, supporting the design of agentic or LLM-based systems as the program matures.

Who You Are:

 

Experienced software engineer and system architect with a proven track record in complex, production-grade environments.

Hands-on with core AWS services and proficiency in Infrastructure as Code (Terraform, AWS CDK, or CloudFormation).

Solid grasp of CI/CD, containerization (Docker / Kubernetes), automated testing, and observability.

Security-conscious, with knowledge of authentication, authorization, and secure system design.

Strong communicator, able to align cross-functional teams and bridge technical and business perspectives.

Culturally adaptable, ideally with experience working in or with Japan-based organizations. Proficiency in Japanese is a plus.

Familiarity with agentic system design or LLM-based architecture (e.g. LangChain, RAG pipelines, vector databases) is an asset, though not a primary requirement for this role.

Job details

Seniority
Not listed
Function
Regulatory Affairs
Therapeutic area
Not listed
Location
Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Employment type
FULL_TIME

How this role compares

Computed from every other active Regulatory Affairs role in our database, not just this employer's listings.

We currently track 438 comparable Regulatory Affairs roles across 98 biopharma companies.

438Comparable roles tracked
404Currently active
98Companies hiring similar roles
52Countries represented

Salary context

119 of 438 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)

Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.

This roleSubject Not listed on this posting
Lowest disclosed · Associate, Quality Records · Pfizer $64,600/yr – $107,600/yr
Peer group range $86,100 – $380,750 (median $205,000)

Where these roles are based

Top locations among the 438 comparable roles

United States179
India35
Japan24
United Kingdom23
Ireland23
Poland18

+ 46 more countries

Seniority mix

348 of 438 peers have a known seniority level

Manager138
Director77
Associate Director45
Senior38
Executive/VP14
Senior Director13
Intern/Fellow/Postdoc12
Associate10
Principal1

Therapeutic area mix

36 of 438 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden

Oncology18
Rare Disease5
Immunology4
Neuroscience3
Vaccines & Infectious Disease2
Cardiovascular / CVRM2
Dermatology & Aesthetics2

Similar opportunities

The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.

40%similar
Regeneron Japan KK Tokyo, Japan Manager
Same function Same country
40%similar
Regeneron Japan KK Tokyo, Japan Manager
Same function Same country
40%similar
BMS Japan Otemachi-JP, Japan Manager
Same function Same country
40%similar
BMS Japan Otemachi-JP, Japan Manager
Same function Same country
40%similar
Amgen K.K. Tokyo, Japan Manager
Same function Same country

Notify me about similar jobs

Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.

How we calculate "similar"

No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.

Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.

40%
Senior Manager, Global Patient Safety
Regeneron Japan KK · Tokyo, Japan · Manager
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
40%
Senior Manager, Labeling & Regulatory Affairs
BMS Japan · Otemachi-JP, Japan · Manager
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
40%
Position Japan Regulatory Strategy Manager
Amgen K.K. · Tokyo, Japan · Manager
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
40%
[Innovative Medicine] R&D, Associate Director/Manager, Global Regulatory Policy & Intelligence, Japan Regulatory Policy, Regulatory Affairs
Johnson & Johnson · Chiyoda, Japan · Associate Director
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
Unmatched or unknown dimensions score exactly the same: 0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.