CyberSecurity Vulnerability Management System Lead (Muntinlupa, Philippines, National Capital Region (NCR))
Notify me about similar jobsAbout this opportunity
The Position
Join Boehringer Ingelheim's Cyber Intelligence & Security Operations Center (CISOC) as a Network Vulnerability Management Engineer. In this role, you will serve as the technical owner and subject matter expert for the organization's network vulnerability management platform, ensuring effective identification, assessment, reporting, and remediation of infrastructure vulnerabilities across the enterprise.
You will combine platform ownership responsibilities with hands-on technical analysis, working closely with infrastructure teams, System Leads, remediation teams, and service management stakeholders to strengthen BI's security posture through continuous improvement of vulnerability management processes and technologies.
Duties & Responsibilities
As a member of the Cyber Intelligence & Security Operations Center (CISOC) team, the role will be responsible for technical ownership, operation and continuous improvement of network vulnerability management. The system mainly supports internal network vulnerability scanning and the reporting of identified vulnerabilities. The engineer will combine platform ownership with hands-on technical vulnerability analysis. Key responsibilities:
System Lead role, including service roadmap, lifecycle, configuration standards, access governance, documentation and continuous improvement.
Administer and maintain the vulnerability-management platform, including scanners, scanning scope, schedules, asset inventory, tags, authentication and scan quality.
Plan and monitor regular internal network vulnerability scans and investigate coverage gaps, failed scans, authentication issues and unexpected results.
Analyse vulnerability findings in technical depth and validate whether detections are true positives or false positives, documenting clear evidence and rationale.
Assess vulnerability severity, exploitability, exposure and business context to support prioritisation and escalation decisions.
Drive the vulnerability reporting process, ensuring findings are correctly enriched, assigned, tracked and communicated to System Leads and remediation teams.
Coordinate rescans and verification activities to confirm remediation or support exception and false-positive decisions.
Develop and maintain Python automation for platform administration, data processing, quality checks, enrichment, reporting and workflow improvement.
Collaborate with ITSM stakeholders to improve vulnerability-ticket creation, assignment, lifecycle, integrations and reporting.
Act as technical escalation point for vulnerability-management issues and coordinate vendor support cases when required.
Follow BI processes and maintain the required operational, compliance and audit documentation.
Requirements:
An ideal candidate will have
Strong hands-on experience in infrastructure or network vulnerability management and technical vulnerability assessment.
Practical experience with Qualys VMDR, Qualys Vulnerability Management or a comparable enterprise vulnerability-scanning platform.
Ability to investigate findings and prove false positives or true positives using technical evidence, including service, version, configuration and network analysis.
Solid knowledge of TCP/IP, operating systems, network services, authentication, asset discovery, vulnerability identifiers and remediation principles.
Python experience for automation, API integration, data analysis and reporting.
Experience managing a security platform as System Lead, service owner or senior technical administrator is highly desirable.
ServiceNow Vulnerability Response, SecOps or general ServiceNow knowledge is highly valuable but not mandatory.
Strong analytical, troubleshooting, documentation and problem-solving skills.
Excellent spoken and written English and experience working in an international, multicultural environment.
Relevant security certifications are desirable but not mandatory.
]]>
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Information Technology role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 1167 comparable Information Technology roles across 74 biopharma companies.
Salary context
162 of 1167 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 1167 comparable roles
+ 29 more countries
Seniority mix
667 of 1167 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
2 of 1167 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Matched on job function only -- seniority, specialty, and location weren't confirmed as aligned.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.