About this opportunity
根据试验方案、合同规定的工作范围、SOP和GCP的要求进行研究中心筛选、启动、监查和关闭访视。
可同时负责多个方案、研究中心和治疗领域内的研究中心监查工作。
对所负责的研究中心进行方案和研究相关的培训，与研究中心进行定期沟通以管理项目进行中的要求和问题。
评估研究中心工作的质量和完整性，确定研究中心是否是按照方案和适用的法规进行研究。将质量问题汇报给负责的PM和/或直线经理。
通过追踪注册申报和批复、招募和入选、病例报告表（CRF）完成和递交、以及数据疑问产生和解决的情况，管理所负责研究中心的进展。
创建和维护与研究中心管理、监查访视的发现以及行动计划相关的文件，递交访视报告和其他所需研究文件。
负责相应研究中心的研究财务管理。
与其他职能部门共同合作。
完成直线经理和/或项目经理（PM）分配的其他工作。
IQVIA is a leading global provider of clinical research services, commercial insights and healthcare intelligence to the life sciences and healthcare industries. We create intelligent connections to accelerate the development and commercialization of innovative medical treatments to help improve patient outcomes and population health worldwide. Learn more at https://jobs.iqvia.com
IQVIA is committed to integrity in our hiring process and maintains a zero tolerance policy for candidate fraud. All information and credentials submitted in your application must be truthful and complete. Any false statements, misrepresentations, or material omissions during the recruitment process will result in immediate disqualification of your application, or termination of employment if discovered later, in accordance with applicable law. We appreciate your honesty and professionalism.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Clinical Research role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 59 comparable Senior Clinical Research roles across 7 biopharma companies.
Salary context
11 of 59 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 59 comparable roles
+ 18 more countries
Seniority mix
59 of 59 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
2 of 59 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Open in 4 locations
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.