About this opportunity
About Human Pharmaceutical Business
With global presence, Boehringer Ingelheim has industry-leading expertise in medicine research and development. We are constantly developing the next generation of medical breakthroughs and successfully delivering innovations to meet the medical needs of the patients we serve in the following key areas of interest: cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic diseases, immunology, oncology and central nervous system. In the future, we will accelerate the launch of more than 10 innovative medicines to meet the demand of Chinese patients.
Job Responsibilities:
Responsible for managing the microbiology laboratory, including daily work scheduling, optimizing personnel utilization efficiency, completing various testing tasks on time, ensuring all testing processes are in a controlled state, and also supporting inspection-related tasks for other QC groups.
Organize the team for carrying out daily sampling and testing for Water sample, environmental monitoring sample, compressed air sample, clean verification sample and finished products, ensure to complete testing and releasing timely.
Organize personnel to conduct microbiological testing of raw and auxiliary materials, packaging materials, intermediate products, to be packaged, stability samples and finished products, ensure to complete testing and releasing timely.
Execute lab equipment qualification and maintenance, ensure to perform all tests smoothly.
Release or reject related materials, to ensure the compliance with testing standard; And then release / reject materials in SAP system.
As core member to lead the Microbial analysis method transfer and Verification to support the new product launch and transfer.
Establish testing specifications, relevant SOPs/Forms, and other documents according to given instructions, ensure to comply with GMP, regulatory and BI requirements
Responsible for promoting a culture of quality and lean projects within the Q department, ensuring continuous optimization and improvement of the lean system.
Be a role model & lead the following the principles. Coach and develop QC employees.
Requirements:
Experience in similar role, minimum of 5 years' MNC experience of QC; minimum of 3 years' leadership experience
Excellent knowledge of GMP
Good specific knowledge relevant to the area/field
Excellent English language skills, both verbal and written
Good knowledge of project management
Good organization and planning skills; good time management for emergent issue and priorities, and good at communication and team work spirit.
Customer service focus and understanding of clients’ needs
Confidence, professionalism, and efficiency in managing responsibilities
Adaptability to change, willingness to share and learn
Excellent communication, negotiation and persuasion skills
]]>
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Quality role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 246 comparable Manager Quality roles across 80 biopharma companies.
Salary context
59 of 246 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 246 comparable roles
+ 27 more countries
Seniority mix
246 of 246 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
1 of 246 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.