Assistant Manager I&D QA
About this opportunity
Roles and Responsibility- Assistant Manager I&D QA
Responsible for ensuring quality support for all project and process related activities with EPD drug product development
Experience -- 9 yrs
Ensure implementation and adherence to applicable policies and procedures
To prepare, review and approve Standard Operating procedures (SOPs)
To review and approve change control, Exceptions, Out of specifications (OOS), planned deviations.
To manage training activities related to QA personnel.
To manage Quality management Review Program.
To manage Internal Audit program and ensure compliance.
To manage Documentation Compliance
To collate data and update quality metrics and monthly reports.
To review CAPA and track its Implementation within the time frame
To ensure implementation AQ/ EQD/EID policies at site.
To manage external and /AQR audit compliance and action plans
Any other activities / support as instructed by the supervisors as and when required.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Quality role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 285 comparable Manager Quality roles across 80 biopharma companies.
Salary context
59 of 285 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 285 comparable roles
+ 26 more countries
Seniority mix
285 of 285 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
0 of 285 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
No peers with a known therapeutic area yet.
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.