UI Designer 交互视觉设计师
Notify me about similar jobsAbout this opportunity
岗位职责:
1.负责 PC 端、移动端、Web 整体视觉风格和 UI 设计,定义并管理设计资源;
2.负责制定视觉与交互的相关设计方法,帮助创造良好体验的产品与服务;
3.参与产品和业务的规划,并提供专业意见;
4.负责优化项目流程和设计过程,并建立设计规范,推动统一的产品设计标准;
5.与产品团队、开发团队、项目管理团队以及合规性和安全性团队等沟通协作,制定详细、适用的产品、解决方案设计实施计划;
任职资格:
1. 本科及以上学历,视觉传达、艺术设计、美术学等相关专业毕业;
2.5 年以上移动端、PC 端产品设计经验,熟悉视觉设计相关方法,熟练使用设计软件,具备 UI 动效设计能力;
3.有完整的项目案例,能够独立中大型项目的UI设计,搭建组件库,制定设计规范; 在产品市场调研、用户故事设计、敏捷产品开发、用户体验和用户界面设计有扎实的知识和丰富的经验 ;
4.具备良好的审美能力和洞察力,具备较强的学习意识和能力,能够创造性的提出设计方案并落地;
5.在制药/医疗健康行业多个接触点的客户体验、服务设计和旅程管理以及产品设计方面的工作经验,有扎实的市场趋势知识,了解制药/医疗健康行业最新的数字产品和应用;
6.擅长跨职能沟通,能够管理与业务利益相关者的高效沟通
7.具有创新和创业精神,能够在模糊和复杂的环境中管理优先事项、解决障碍、做出决策并产生影响
Pfizer is an equal opportunity employer and complies with all applicable equal employment opportunity legislation in each jurisdiction in which it operates.
To learn more about acceptable and prohibited uses of AI during the recruitment process, please review our candidate AI-use guidelines available on Pfizer Careers .

Information & Business Tech
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Information Technology role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 1167 comparable Information Technology roles across 74 biopharma companies.
Salary context
162 of 1167 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 1167 comparable roles
+ 29 more countries
Seniority mix
667 of 1167 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
2 of 1167 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.