About this opportunity
Job Overview
Responsible for study build & design, edit specifications, system configurations and is accountable for associated study design components. This role will collaborate with various stakeholders- DTL, Programmer, Validation Team, vendors, statisticians, and client representatives. In addition to project deliveries, the role also would be responsible for the project financials from programming shared services perspective.
Essential Functions
• Interprets the study protocol.
• Design and update the eCRF using third party or in house CDMS tools in alignment with industry standards like SDTM, CDASH as applicable.
• Create and update Edit Specification Document.
• Generate specifications for EDC build components (e.g., Rights and Roles, System Settings and Home Page)
• Complete the Study Authorization Form and Trial Capacity Request Form (InForm)
• Attend the Pre-Design Meeting, Online Screen Review Meeting, Unblinded Data review meeting. Attend and present comments at the Internal Design Review Meeting. May lead Online Screen Review Meeting.
• Facilitate the internal Edit Specification Review Meeting and leads the discussions regarding the Edit Specification Document.
• Design the database to collect LLRR data within the InForm database and ensure Rights and Roles document has appropriate access for Entry and Updates.
• Communicate any project risks to the Data Team Lead, including the potential for missing a timeline in the Data Management Project Plan.
• Escalate potential quality issues.
• Ensure the completion and documentation of all project-specific training, as well as staying current with required Standard Operating Procedures.
• Reviews build timelines and provide input as applicable.
• Reviews QIP for own projects, identify out of scope activities if any and inform relevant parties.
• Responsible for multiple study design projects at the same time.
• Might be working on projects across multiple platforms.
• Identify areas for process improvements on an ongoing basis. Actively take part and contribute towards process improvement initiatives as assigned besides providing suggestions for continuous improvement of processes.
• All responsibilities are essential job functions unless noted as nonessential (N).
Qualifications
• Bachelor's Degree Bachelor in Science/Computer science/Information Technology or Bachelor in Technology Req
• 2-4 years of relevant core Technical designer experience and total exp being 7+ yrs. Req
IQVIA is a leading global provider of clinical research services, commercial insights and healthcare intelligence to the life sciences and healthcare industries. We create intelligent connections to accelerate the development and commercialization of innovative medical treatments to help improve patient outcomes and population health worldwide. Learn more at https://jobs.iqvia.com
IQVIA is committed to integrity in our hiring process and maintains a zero tolerance policy for candidate fraud. All information and credentials submitted in your application must be truthful and complete. Any false statements, misrepresentations, or material omissions during the recruitment process will result in immediate disqualification of your application, or termination of employment if discovered later, in accordance with applicable law. We appreciate your honesty and professionalism.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Clinical Development role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 1275 comparable Clinical Development roles across 107 biopharma companies.
Salary context
406 of 1275 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 1275 comparable roles
+ 48 more countries
Seniority mix
903 of 1275 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
189 of 1275 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.