Pharmacovigilance Regulatory Reporting Specialist
Notify me about similar jobsAbout this opportunity
Job Overview
As a Regulatory Reporting Specialist, you will be involved in submitting safety reports to regulatory authorities.
Review, assess, and process safety data and information received from various sources. Distribute reports/data to internal and external third parties following applicable regulations, Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), and internal guidelines under the guidance and support of senior operation team members.
Essential Functions
Process safety data according to applicable regulations, guidelines, SOPs, and project requirements.
Ensure compliance with quality, productivity, and delivery standards per project requirements.
Track cases as applicable to the project plan.
Identify and report quality problems to senior team members.
Liaise with different functional team members and health care professionals to address project-related issues.
Attend project team meetings and provide feedback to the operations manager on challenges, issues, or successes.
Qualifications
Bachelor's degree in life sciences
Languages: Advanced level of English
2-3 years of experience in pharmacovigilance activities (mandatory) Specifically in regulatory reporting, will be highly valued.
Previous experience working with Argus is required
Good knowledge of medical terminology and applicable safety databases.
Strong organizational skills, attention to detail, and ability to work independently and as part of a team.
Work modality:
100% home-based
IQVIA is a leading global provider of clinical research services, commercial insights and healthcare intelligence to the life sciences and healthcare industries. We create intelligent connections to accelerate the development and commercialization of innovative medical treatments to help improve patient outcomes and population health worldwide. Learn more at https://jobs.iqvia.com
IQVIA is committed to integrity in our hiring process and maintains a zero tolerance policy for candidate fraud. All information and credentials submitted in your application must be truthful and complete. Any false statements, misrepresentations, or material omissions during the recruitment process will result in immediate disqualification of your application, or termination of employment if discovered later, in accordance with applicable law. We appreciate your honesty and professionalism.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Pharmacovigilance role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 130 comparable Pharmacovigilance roles across 48 biopharma companies.
Salary context
35 of 130 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 130 comparable roles
+ 22 more countries
Seniority mix
93 of 130 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
19 of 130 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Matched on job function only -- seniority, specialty, and location weren't confirmed as aligned.
Matched on job function only -- seniority, specialty, and location weren't confirmed as aligned.
Matched on job function only -- seniority, specialty, and location weren't confirmed as aligned.
Matched on job function only -- seniority, specialty, and location weren't confirmed as aligned.
Matched on job function only -- seniority, specialty, and location weren't confirmed as aligned.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.