医学信息沟通专员
Notify me about similar jobsWe couldn't confirm this posting on Pfizer Investment Co., Ltd. China's site in our latest checks -- see current similar openings below.
About this opportunity
1. 在公司政策和程序指引下传达医学信息 , 达成公司指标；
2. 及时提供市场信息并做出适当建议；
3. 申请和报销 PIM 、院内会和 MICS 区域内的院间会；
4. 与客户建立良好关系，保持公司形象；
5. 能够严格管理自己的销售行为，确保日常销售工作全部遵循公司政策、行业准则以及相关法律，包括但不限于 FCPA ( 《反海外腐败法》 ) 及相关中国大陆境内相关反腐法律条款。严守诚信，保持真实透明，在过往的销售工作中无任何违反法律规定的行为发生。
Pfizer is an equal opportunity employer and complies with all applicable equal employment opportunity legislation in each jurisdiction in which it operates.
To learn more about acceptable and prohibited uses of AI during the recruitment process, please review our candidate AI-use guidelines available on Pfizer Careers .
Sales
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Sales role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 4506 comparable Sales roles across 209 biopharma companies.
Salary context
922 of 4506 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 4506 comparable roles
+ 76 more countries
Seniority mix
1754 of 4506 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
1101 of 4506 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Currently open similar roles
This posting is closed, but here are live openings closest to it -- ranked by similarity, not by how well you'd qualify for them.
Open in 2 locations
Open in 2 locations
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
Or follow a whole field: get every new Sales job in China, and choose locations and companies.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.