About this opportunity
销售代表是我们客户互动和销售业绩的主要推动者。他们是我们的客户体验方法的代言人，并建立深厚的关系，为客户和患者创造价值，以合规和合乎道德的方式推动销售增长。
Major Accountabilities~ 推动有竞争力的销售增长 ~ 通过反映客户偏好、利用可用内容和多个互动渠道，为目标 HCP 个性化和编排客户互动旅程 ~ 通过与 HCP 合作，为诺华建立长期的持续合作关系 ~ 通过倾听客户的需求并了解他们的医疗保健环境，提供令人难忘的、以客户为中心的体验，超越临床差异化 ~ 利用可用的数据源来创建、动态优先排序和调整相关的区域、客户和客户交互计划 ~ 持续与相关内部利益相关者分享客户见解，以支持与产品和适应症相关的内容、活动和互动计划的开发 ~ 为客户和患者创造价值 ~ 与跨职能团队合作，设计和实施解决方案，解决未满足的客户和患者需求 ~ 以正直和诚实的态度行事，以透明和尊重的方式对待客户和同事，并有明确的意图。当面临道德困境时，做正确的事，当事情看起来不对劲时，就大声说出来。遵守诺华道德、价值观和行为准则。Key Performance Indicators销售代表是我们客户互动和销售业绩的主要推动者。他们是我们的客户体验方法的代言人，并建立深厚的关系，为客户和患者创造价值，以合规和合乎道德的方式推动销售增长。Work Experience~NASkills~销售技巧~客户洞察~沟通技巧~影响技能~冲突管理~谈判技巧~技术技能~账户管理~跨职能协调~医疗保健行业~商业卓越~伦理学~合规Language英语
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Sales role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 3662 comparable Sales roles across 181 biopharma companies.
Salary context
895 of 3662 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 3662 comparable roles
+ 70 more countries
Seniority mix
1522 of 3662 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
1155 of 3662 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Open in 2 locations
Open in 3 locations
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.