(高级)地区经理
Notify me about similar jobsWe couldn't confirm this posting on Novartis's site in our latest checks -- see current similar openings below.
About this opportunity
一线销售经理 （FLM） 通过领导多元化的商业团队并与主要利益相关者互动来推动量身定制的客户体验并提供价值，从而推动销售业绩。他们招募、培养、留住和指导个人，以成功实现战略和商业区域目标。 他们灌输了一种高绩效和问责制的文化，激励和激励团队以合规和合乎道德的方式执行以客户为中心的品牌战略和战术 FLM 领导、执行和跟进其所在地区的品牌战略和战术，分享现场见解，以推动客户、参与度和绩效。
关于此角色：作为一线业务领导者，您将带领团队推动辖区业务发展，通过人才培养、团队赋能与跨职能协作，将战略转化为执行成果，在提升业务表现的同时，为更多患者带来积极改变。 主要职责：l 负责辖区业务发展及团队管理，带领团队依法依规开展药品信息传递和学术沟通，确保业务活动符合国家法律法规及公司合规要求l 通过业务规划、团队辅导、绩效管理和跨职能协作推动区域业务发展，持续提升团队专业能力和执行质量l 培养和发展人才，建设高敬业度团队，践行诺华“求知、赋能、诚信、激发”的价值观，发挥影响力、赋能团队成长，为患者创造更大价值 对多元化和包容性/平等就业机会的承诺：诺华致力于为我们所服务的患者和社区建立一个优秀、包容的工作环境和多元化的团队。 基本要求：l 需符合医药代表备案管理规定的专业与学历，以及从业资格要求l 大学本科及以上学历 l 良好的英语听说读写能力 l 3年以上制药行业相关经验，1年以上管理经验l 出色的的团队管理/领导能力l 合规意识强
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Sales role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 4506 comparable Sales roles across 209 biopharma companies.
Salary context
922 of 4506 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 4506 comparable roles
+ 76 more countries
Seniority mix
1754 of 4506 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
1101 of 4506 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Currently open similar roles
This posting is closed, but here are live openings closest to it -- ranked by similarity, not by how well you'd qualify for them.
Open in 2 locations
Open in 2 locations
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
Or follow a whole field: get every new Sales job in China, and choose locations and companies.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.