CTA Intern （Admin function）
About this opportunity
主要职责：
1. 协助同事进行报告(excel 格式)的编辑、排序、整合, 并完成IQVIA 内部系统的编辑、标记
2. 协助同事进行PDF 扫描发票的收集、排序、整合
3. PDF 发票的打印、整理、标记、邮寄
4. 协助部门在北京办 admin的工作包括但不限于会议协调、物资管理、文件管理，客户和市场宣传材料的准备等
5. 帮忙完成团队交予的其他相关工作
任职要求：
1. 在校生优先，大专及以上学历
2. 每周至少3天onsite，可连续实习至少5个月
3. 工作认真负责细心，态度积极
4. 学习能力强，能快速掌握要求，完成交予的任务
5. 有较强的office软件使用技能，熟练运用excel, pdf, word等办公软件
6. 有一定的沟通能力，邮件书写技能，能看懂英文邮件
IQVIA is a leading global provider of advanced analytics, technology solutions and clinical research services to the life sciences industry. We believe in pushing the boundaries of human science and data science to make the biggest impact possible – to help our customers create a healthier world. Learn more at https://jobs.iqvia.com
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Clinical Development role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 68 comparable Intern/Fellow/Postdoc Clinical Development roles across 20 biopharma companies.
Salary context
12 of 68 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 68 comparable roles
+ 14 more countries
Seniority mix
68 of 68 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
4 of 68 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
Or follow a whole field: get every new Clinical Development job in China, and choose locations and companies.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.