CRC 1/2/Sr-Avacare
About this opportunity
职责
• 作为研究团队成员，遵照法规要求、商定的工作范围、适用的SOP、工作授权和试验方案，在 研究中心进行工作。
• 协助研究者完成可行性调查问卷和回收问卷。
• 推动研究中心启动工作：协助研究中心筛选访视，协助及时提交文件到伦理委员会进行审批 和试验用药品的发放，协助研究中心启动访视。
• 协助研究者进行受试者筛选和入组研究。
• 得到研究者授权后，根据法规和GCP的要求，协助研究者顺利完成方案要求的随访和步骤：如 制定计划、清点核对药品和其他协调工作。
• 在研究中心协助研究者管理试验用药品、研究物资和实验室样本。
• 在商定的工作范围内，参加研究者会、监查访视、稽查和其他会议。
• 协助研究者归档研究资料，并提交至伦理委员会或其他权威机构。
• 准确地将原始文件中的数据填写到病例报告表，并协助query的解答。
• 推动研究中心关闭：协助研究中心关闭访视、试验用药品和研究资料的回收，以及研究资料 的归档。
• 创建和维护日常工作报告和其他工作文件。
• 根据工作需要，可能需要不定时出差或暂时借调至其他城市。
• 完成分配的其他任务。
所需知识、技能和能力
• 了解临床研究的基本知识和适用的法规要求。
• 熟悉医学术语。
• 良好的人际沟通及组织能力。
• 熟练使用微软办公软件。
• 熟练的中文说写能力。要求基本的英语水平。
• 能独立完成任务，根据优先级选择重点，寻找资源，能解决问题，适应在团队中工作。
• 能够严格保密。
学历和经验要求
• 大专及以上学历，临床医学、药理学、护理、卫生保健或其他医学相关专业。 • 未满1年的临床究协调员经验。
• 临床研究或医药行业工作/实习经验。
IQVIA is a leading global provider of clinical research services, commercial insights and healthcare intelligence to the life sciences and healthcare industries. We create intelligent connections to accelerate the development and commercialization of innovative medical treatments to help improve patient outcomes and population health worldwide. Learn more at https://jobs.iqvia.com
IQVIA is committed to integrity in our hiring process and maintains a zero tolerance policy for candidate fraud. All information and credentials submitted in your application must be truthful and complete. Any false statements, misrepresentations, or material omissions during the recruitment process will result in immediate disqualification of your application, or termination of employment if discovered later, in accordance with applicable law. We appreciate your honesty and professionalism.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Clinical Development role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 296 comparable Senior Clinical Development roles across 55 biopharma companies.
Salary context
95 of 296 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 296 comparable roles
+ 31 more countries
Seniority mix
296 of 296 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
33 of 296 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.