Associate Director, Real World Evidence Strategy (Integrated Evidence Planning) (FSP Sponsor Dedicated)
About this opportunity
Job Summary
This role within the Chief Medical Office organization will support the operational development, maintenance, and monitoring of asset-level Integrated Evidence Plans (IEPs). Working under the strategic direction of the Medical Evidence Development Therapeutic Area Lead and other designated strategy owners, this role will lead the coordination of evidence plan development, facilitate cross-functional input, track execution, and support timely updates as evidence needs and asset priorities evolve.
Responsibilities
Integrated Evidence Planning Coordinatio n
Coordinate the development of Integrated Evidence Plans (IEPs) based on evidence strategy and priorities established by the Medical Evidence Development Therapeutic Area Lead, asset leadership, and relevant governance teams.
Facilitate/coordinate cross-functional working sessions to gather, document, and reconcile input from Medical Affairs, Epidemiology/RWE, Statistics/Programming, Regulatory, Safety, Operations, Quality, Global Access & Value, International, and other partner functions.
Translate approved evidence strategy into a structured IEP that clearly documents evidence gaps, planned activities, dependencies, owners, timelines, and expected deliverables.
Apply established planning frameworks, templates, and standards to support consistency and quality across assigned asset IEPs.
Escalate unresolved strategic questions, prioritization decisions, resource constraints, and material cross-functional misalignment to the appropriate strategy owner or governance forum.
Maintain current versions of assigned IEPs and coordinate periodic reviews and refreshes in response to approved strategy changes, emerging evidence, study results, or changes in asset plans.
Support evaluation of whether proposed evidence-generation activities are operationally feasible and sufficiently defined for implementation.
Identify opportunities to apply established or emerging evidence-generation approaches and bring recommendations to appropriate subject-matter experts and decision owners.
IEP Maintenance, Monitoring & Execution Support
Coordinate ongoing monitoring of IEP activities for assigned assets, including milestones, dependencies, risks, decisions, and changes to planned evidence-generation activities.
Partner with the MED Program Management team and study teams to maintain trackers, dashboards, meeting materials, and status reports supporting oversight of the medical research agenda.
Prepare consolidated progress updates and decision-support materials for the Therapeutic Area Lead, asset teams, Medical Affairs leadership, and other designated stakeholders.
Follow up with activity owners to confirm that approved actions, plan updates, and agreed deliverables are reflected in the IEP and supporting tracking tools.
Support early research concept discussions by documenting requirements, coordinating input, and connecting teams with relevant MED and functional subject-matter experts.
Track execution risks and limitations, support development of mitigation actions, and escalate issues requiring strategic or governance decisions.
Provide operational input into selected study-design and planning discussions, while deferring final scientific, strategic, regulatory, and prioritization decisions to accountable functional leaders.
Coordinate review of selected regulatory and study-level documents by the appropriate MED asset and functional reviewers, as requested.
Participate in therapeutic-area or enterprise evidence-generation initiatives as the operational representative for assigned assets.
Qualifications
PhD or Master’s degree in Epidemiology preferred . MD, PharmD, Bachelor’s degree may be considered with significant applicable experience.
Experience supporting Integrated Evidence Planning required . Experience supporting medical affairs research, real world evidence, outcomes research, or clinical development is an added bonus.
Experience coordinating multi-stakeholder planning activities and translating strategic direction into clear plans, actions, timelines, and tracking mechanisms.
Strong working knowledge of the drug-development process and the role of medical evidence generation across the asset lifecycle; oncology experience is preferred where relevant to the assigned portfolio.
Strong understanding of observational research, real-world evidence, and low-interventional study approaches, with the ability to engage appropriate scientific and methodological experts.
Demonstrated ability to facilitate cross-functional discussions, synthesize diverse inputs, document decisions, and escalate issues appropriately.
Strong organizational, project coordination, and communication skills, with attention to version control, dependencies, risks, and follow-through.
Experience supporting regulatory-grade evidence projects or regulatory interactions is desirable; accountability for regulatory strategy or correspondence is not required.
Ability to work effectively in a matrix environment under the direction of senior strategy and functional leaders.
IQVIA is a leading global provider of clinical research services, commercial insights and healthcare intelligence to the life sciences and healthcare industries. We create intelligent connections to accelerate the development and commercialization of innovative medical treatments to help improve patient outcomes and population health worldwide. Learn more at https://jobs.iqvia.com
IQVIA is proud to be an equal opportunity employer. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, disability, status as a protected veteran, or any other status protected by applicable law. https://jobs.iqvia.com/eoe
IQVIA is committed to integrity in our hiring process and maintains a zero tolerance policy for candidate fraud. All information and credentials submitted in your application must be truthful and complete. Any false statements, misrepresentations, or material omissions during the recruitment process will result in immediate disqualification of your application, or termination of employment if discovered later, in accordance with applicable law. We appreciate your honesty and professionalism.
The potential base pay range for this role, when annualized, is $111,000.00 - $309,200.00. The actual base pay offered may vary based on a number of factors including job-related qualifications such as knowledge, skills, education, and experience; location; and/or schedule (full or part-time). Dependent on the position offered, incentive plans, bonuses, and/or other forms of compensation may be offered, in addition to a range of health and welfare and/or other benefits.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Biostatistics & Data Science role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 135 comparable Associate Director Biostatistics & Data Science roles across 29 biopharma companies.
Salary context
70 of 135 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 135 comparable roles
+ 12 more countries
Seniority mix
135 of 135 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
17 of 135 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.