Medical Science Liaison -RLT
About this opportunity
Lead scientific engagement with their Medical Experts. Implement clinical and educational strategies and respond to unsolicited medical enquiries.
Major accountabilities: Provide account education for on-site preparation and infusion processes for RLT/RLI products, and education for appropriate radiopharmaceutical licensing and licencing logistics.Identify, establish and maintain collaborative relationships with national opinion leaders, investigators, institutions and professional societies strategic to appropriate product development and use.Profile and mapping external accounts with focus on nuclear medicine and radiation oncology, urology and other clinic departments.Partner and support internal partners with GDD, TRD, NPP and training for educational materials and appropriate educational presentations to external partners.Lead RLT regional critical projects, launch preparation activities, liaising with society associations in line with the medical strategy, and remove clinical & non-clinical barriers.Support country medical affairs strategy in line with the global strategy, country insights and secure regional implementation of planned Medical Affairs activities within the designated therapy area(s). Key performance indicators: Works within Ethics and Compliance policiesAchievement of annual targets for medical activities. Minimum Requirements: Masters' degree or above, medical background, clinical medicine is preferred Work Experience: MNC MSL experience in oncology area is preferred Skills:Good communication skillMedical Education and Scientific Engagement Languages :English
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Medical Affairs role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 924 comparable Medical Affairs roles across 130 biopharma companies.
Salary context
175 of 924 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 924 comparable roles
+ 52 more countries
Seniority mix
502 of 924 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
326 of 924 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Open in 4 locations
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.