心血管和移植事业部-医学信息沟通代表-自贡
About this opportunity
招聘职位
职位名称： 医学信息沟通代表
职责描述：
在公司政策和程序指引下向客户提供及时准确的专业支持，建立合作伙伴关系
在公司政策和程序指引下充分利用资源进行有效的客户拜访，传递产品价值信息
在公司政策和程序指引下规划和组织各种会议或活动，挖掘区域市场潜力
通过公司管理系统以及其他合规的渠道和方式，收集市场信息，进行分析，反馈和建议
完成上级经理指派的其他各项工作
任职资格
教育背景：具有医学、药学或相关专业，大专及以上学历
工作经验：1年以上相关工作经验，过往有较好绩效
具备学术推广能力、客户管理、强执行力等关键技能
具备韧性、学习敏锐度、结果导向等特质
具备高度的合规意识
Pursue progress , discover extraordinary
Better is out there. Better medications, better outcomes, better science. But progress doesn’t happen without people – people from different backgrounds, in different locations, doing different roles, all united by one thing: a desire to make miracles happen. So, let’s be those people.
At Sanofi, we provide equal opportunities to all regardless of race, colour, ancestry, religion, sex, national origin, sexual orientation, age, citizenship, marital status, ability or gender identity.
Watch our ALL IN video and check out our Diversity Equity and Inclusion actions at sanofi.com !
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Sales role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 2393 comparable Sales roles across 138 biopharma companies.
Salary context
636 of 2393 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 2393 comparable roles
+ 59 more countries
Seniority mix
956 of 2393 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
651 of 2393 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Open in 2 locations
Open in 2 locations
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.