About this opportunity
与我们携手施展你的超能力！
探索未知、打破壁垒、勇于发现，你准备好了吗？你有宏图大志正待实现，我们同样雄心勃勃。我们遍布全球的员工热爱科技创新，以医药健康、生命科学和电子科技领域的解决方案，切实改善人类生活。我们怀揣远大梦想，热忱关爱员工、客户、患者和人类居住的这颗星球。因此我们一直在寻找永葆好奇心的你，与我们一路同行、敢想敢做，把不可能变为可能！
职位描述：
确认和检查批量生产物料，然后在SAP中进行确认
汇总并确认年度生产费用预算，跟踪分析月度情况，控制和平衡费用使用
收集和分析关键工艺数据和关键质量数据
每月跟踪LE&OEE状态和产量改进；评估数据准确性
负责生产部门的文件管理
根据收到的市场需求、物料状况和产能配合制定主生产计划
根据MPS 提出日生产计划，及时准确地分配工艺订单；
协调生产线效率改进；
协调验证/资格和商业生产，并为这些生产准备材料；
分析和报告商业产品的成本差异；
创建和更新 BOM 和配方。
根据物料申请表（物料退回表）在SAP 中进行转移要求；
及时更新了相关的SOP 和文件
任职要求：
了解MRP原则、物料管理最佳实践和良好生产实践
英语阅读与交际
较强的沟通协调能力
熟悉办公软件和SAP
我们提供的机遇：我们是一群充满好奇心的伙伴，有着不同的背景、视角和生活经历。我们相信，多元化将推动卓越与创新，从而提升我们在科技领域的领导力。我们致力于为所有人创造平等的发展机会，让每个人都能按照自己的节奏成长。加入我们，共同打造一个具有包容性与归属感的文化，影响数百万人，助力每个人推动人类进步！
立即申请，加入这个致力于点燃创新火花，提升人类福祉的团队！
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Manufacturing & CMC role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 1793 comparable Manufacturing & CMC roles across 130 biopharma companies.
Salary context
527 of 1793 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 1793 comparable roles
+ 41 more countries
Seniority mix
789 of 1793 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
6 of 1793 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.