Medical Science Liaison (Małopolskie, Poland, Małopolskie)
About this opportunity
Position: Medical Science Liaison (regions: South-Central Poland)
The position
The Medical Science Liaison (MSL) serves as the primary medical contact for External Experts, engaging them in scientific discussions and projects to maximize the potential of Boehringer Ingelheim medications. These activities align with the agreed strategy and compliance regulations, balancing customer-facing and back-office responsibilities.
Tasks & responsibilities
As Medical Science Liaison (MSL), you will be responsible for:
Building and maintaining medical/scientific expertise for the pipeline product in Cardio-Renal-Metabolic Therapeutic Area
Strategic planning and implementation of pre-launch medical activities
Providing strategic medical input for local new brand launch preparation.
Planning, executing and monitoring the effectiveness of local medical activities.
Acting as primary medical contact with external experts (EEs) (more than 70% of working time spent).
Identifying, interacting and engaging with EEs, clinicians, scientific societies and other data-driven stakeholders to understand and satisfy Boehringer Ingelheim and customer needs and driving awareness for Boehringer Ingelheim's products in the academic and clinical community.
Contributing with medical expertise to cross-functional activities.
Providing medical training to ensure sufficient product knowledge of Field Force (FF) and other departments.
Coordinating, executing and monitoring the effectiveness of local medical activities and programs such as non-interventional studies, non-trial activities, Investigator Initiated Studies (IIS) or compassionate use programs.
About our future employee
You should have good command of the English language (business, specialized, and medical vocabulary) and previous experience in pharmaceutical industry (medical affairs) or clinical experience.
Additionally we are looking for:
Previous business background (sales/marketing) could be an asset.
Higher education – medical doctor, pharmacist, medical-related sciences, biological sciences, or related fields; a PhD in medical-related sciences, biological sciences, or related fields will be an additional advantage.
Professional experience gained in an innovative pharmaceutical company.
Knowledge of basic human anatomy and physiology.
Experience in a similar position will be an additional advantage.
Interpersonal skills and ability to work in a team.
Analytical and synthetic thinking skills.
Independence and responsibility.
Goal-oriented mindset with respect for internal and external rules.
Teaching skills.
Proactivity and persistence in seeking innovative solutions.
Business-oriented approach.
What we offer
Stable employment in a leading pharmaceutical company.
Task-based working hours.
Salary commensurate with the level of experience and competencies.
Work tools – company car, laptop, phone, office equipment.
Comprehensive preparation for the role.
Independence in daily activities.
]]>
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Medical Affairs role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 924 comparable Medical Affairs roles across 130 biopharma companies.
Salary context
175 of 924 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 924 comparable roles
+ 52 more countries
Seniority mix
502 of 924 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
326 of 924 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.