Global Clinical Operations- Site Partnership Manager
About this opportunity
The SSO Site Partnership Manager optimizes the cooperation with selected trial sites, considered key accounts for Novartis with huge potential to significantly contribute to the portfolio execution, aiming to improve performance in clinical studies regarding patient numbers, timelines, data flow and quality and thus establishes Novartis as partner of choice in clinical trials.
Key responsibilities: In cooperation with study sites: Responsible for key account network within the country/extended country group (OPCs & satellite countries)Defines tailored engagement model with assigned sites according to local and structural needs of these sitesPrepares and implements Site Partnership Strategy Plans in cooperation with assigned accountsDefines measures of success for each site in scope (e.g., % increase in portfolio volume, patient density, start-up, and contracting timelines)·Single point of contact for all relevant stakeholders (e.g., departments heads, investigators, pharmacists, clinic administration) across all therapeutic areas at assigned sites regarding all study overarching topicsCommunicates Novartis standards & expectations for future collaboration Supports feasibility process in close cooperation with Feasibility ManagerSupports and optimizes early site engagement, speed of site initiation readiness as well as achievement of committed patient numbers in the assigned sites Responsibility to analyze all information regarding the assigned sites, to oversee all study activities and to survey sites´ strengths, areas of improvement and capacities Support sites in developing network with other departments to improve study start-up, patient management and recruitment Support negotiation of study fees, contracts, contract templates and master templates as applicable Novartis internal: Optimizes Novartis processes to simplify and speed up study start-up with focus on site set-up Communicates knowledge regarding sites and the overarching topics to the organization and informs and advises relevant functions actively (e. g. site selections) Essential requirements:Degree in scientific or health discipline required and an advanced degree with clinical trial experience and/or project management (preferred)Fluent in English and local language (written and spoken)Minimum 5 years’ experience in clinical research in a role that oversees (project management) and/or with monitoring clinical trials Capable of leading in a matrix environment, without direct reports Understanding of all aspects of clinical drug development with particular emphasis on monitoring and study executionStrong project management capabilities with demonstrated ability to problem solve and mediate complex issues Desirable requirements:Thorough understanding of the international aspects of drug development processes, including strong knowledge of international standards (GCP/ICH), health authorities (FDA/EMA), local/National Health Authorities regulations and Novartis standards Demonstrated negotiation and conflict resolution skills both internal and external (site relationships) Strong influencing and presentation skills Strong communication skills Communicates effectively in a local/global matrix environment
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Clinical Development role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 266 comparable Manager Clinical Development roles across 45 biopharma companies.
Salary context
64 of 266 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 266 comparable roles
+ 23 more countries
Seniority mix
266 of 266 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
26 of 266 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.