Full-Stack Developer (.NET & ReactJS)
About this opportunity
Full-Stack Developer (.NET & ReactJS) with Test Management and Test Automation Experience
We are looking for a skilled .NET and ReactJS Full-Stack Developer with experience in test management and test automation. In this role, you will develop and maintain business applications, support Azure and Office 365 integration, and help ensure quality through structured testing, defect management, and automated test coverage for UI, API, integration, and regression testing.
Your Role:
Develop, enhance, and maintain full-stack applications using .NET (Core or Framework), ReactJS, RESTful APIs and Databases (like SQL Server, MongoDB or PostgreSQL).
Implement responsive user interfaces, integrate business services, and support Azure and Office 365 application scenarios.
Plan and coordinate testing activities, including test cases, execution, defect tracking, reporting, UAT, and release readiness.
Design and maintain automated tests for UI, API, integration, and regression testing, including integration into CI/CD pipelines.
Collaborate with developers, QA teams, and business stakeholders to deliver secure, maintainable, and high-quality solutions.
Who You Are:
Master or Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science, Software Engineering, or a related field.
5-7 years of proven full-stack development experience with .NET Core/.NET Framework, ReactJS, HTML, CSS, JavaScript, RESTful APIs.
Hands-on experience in test management, including planning, coordinating executions, defect management, reporting, and release validation.
Experience with test automation frameworks and tools for frontend, backend, API, and regression testing, ideally integrated into CI/CD pipelines.
Knowledge of Azure services, Office 365 development and integration scenarios, PowerShell scripting, and tools such as Azure DevOps or Jira.
Strong analytical, problem-solving, communication, and collaboration skills.
Preferred Skills:
Experience working in Agile development environments.
Experience with structured QA processes, release validation, and user acceptance testing coordination.
Familiarity with automation tools and frameworks such as Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, NUnit, xUnit, or similar.
Familiarity with version control systems (eg. TFVC, Git).
Knowledge of additional programming languages, frameworks, or cloud technologies is an advantage.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Information Technology role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 1211 comparable Information Technology roles across 60 biopharma companies.
Salary context
152 of 1211 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 1211 comparable roles
+ 26 more countries
Seniority mix
665 of 1211 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
2 of 1211 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Notify me about similar jobs
Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.