Boehringer Ingelheim

(Senior) Medical Science Liaison (Taipei City, Taiwan, Taipei City)

Taipei City, Taiwan Type not listed
Medical Affairs Senior

Boehringer Ingelheim is the source of truth for this posting and owns the application process. We surface normalized context and market comparison you won't find on the original listing.

About this opportunity

The Position

To provide scientific information to SEs/HCPs(scientific expert/ healthcare professionals ), to implement medical programs, and support medical/scientific needs of SEs/HCPs in oncology.

 

Task & Responsibilities:

Engage in peer level dialogue with key customers and deliver appropriate clinical/scientific content through multiple channels in a compliant manner

Develop and implement EE (external experts) engagement plan, and maintain strong scientific relationship with EEs of strategic importance to Boehringer Ingelheim products/pipeline

Recognize and capture medical insights or intelligence, feedback to medical and cross-functional organizations to be actioned in support of the strategy development

Develop and implement field medical plan and activities including but not limited to data dissemination, advisory board meeting and CME/SEM (continue medical education/scientific expert meeting)

Deliver Boehringer Ingelheim product/pipeline asset specific training, and provide key scientific updates to external and internal stakeholders (Commercial, Market access, HEOR, PV, Regulatory, etc.)

As necessary, initiate and support local data generation activities including scientific publication, company-sponsored research and local trials programs (e.g., Phase IV studies, IIS (investigator-initiated studies), NIS (non-investigate study), PMS (post marketing surveillance), EAP (expanded access program) etc.

Provide responses to unsolicited request for medical information

 

Requirements:

Master’s degree, PharmD or PhD in Life Sciences or a scientific discipline related to Pharmacy

Minimum 2 years working experience in MNPC

Good knowledge of clinical study methodology, study design, data review and analysis, publication processes

Excellent planning, presentation, and project management skills to deliver on complex tasks within timeframe and milestones

Excellent oral and written communication and interpersonal skills; Ability to communicate internally and externally using multiple approaches

 

Want to learn more?

Visit www.boehringer-ingelheim.com

 

Position Area

Medical

 

Position Area

Taiwan, Taipei

 

Organization

TW – Boehringer Ingelheim Taiwan Ltd

 

Schedule

Full time

]]>

Job details

Seniority
Senior
Function
Medical Affairs
Therapeutic area
Not listed
Location
Taipei City, Taiwan
Employment type
Not listed

How this role compares

Computed from every other active Medical Affairs role in our database, not just this employer's listings.

We currently track 140 comparable Senior Medical Affairs roles across 44 biopharma companies.

140Comparable roles tracked
118Currently active
44Companies hiring similar roles
18Countries represented

Salary context

37 of 140 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)

Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.

This roleSubject Not listed on this posting
Lowest disclosed · Senior Medical Writer - Vaccine · Sanofi Vaccines US Inc. $122,250/yr – $176,583/yr
Peer group range $149,417 – $258,000 (median $181,500)

Where these roles are based

Top locations among the 140 comparable roles

United States75
India12
China11
Taiwan9
Japan8
South Korea5

+ 12 more countries

Seniority mix

140 of 140 peers have a known seniority level

Senior96
Associate Director39
Principal5

Therapeutic area mix

61 of 140 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden

Oncology25
Neuroscience7
Rare Disease7
Dermatology & Aesthetics6
Vaccines & Infectious Disease6
Cardiovascular / CVRM5
Immunology3
Respiratory1
Ophthalmology1

Similar opportunities

The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.

60%similar
AbbVie Taipei, tw Senior
Same function Same seniority Same country
60%similar
Amgen Taiwan Limited Taipei City, Taiwan Senior
Same function Same seniority Same country
60%similar
Amgen Taiwan Limited Taipei City, Taiwan Senior
Same function Same seniority Same country
60%similar
Pfizer Limited (Taiwan) Taipei City, Taiwan Senior
Same function Same seniority Same country
60%similar
Sanofi Taiwan Co Ltd Taipei City, Taiwan Senior
Same function Same seniority Same country
60%similar
Novo Nordisk Taipei, Taiwan Senior
Same function Same seniority Same country

How we calculate "similar"

No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.

Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.

60%
(Sr.) Medical Science Liaison, Neuroscience
AbbVie · Taipei, tw · Senior
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
60%
Site Activation Partner (Sr. Associate)
Pfizer Limited (Taiwan) · Taipei City, Taiwan · Senior
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
60%
(Senior) Medical Science Liaison (Taichung City, Taiwan, Taipei City)
Boehringer Ingelheim · Taichung City, Taiwan · Senior
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
45%
MSL/Sr. MSL, Lung Solid Tumor (Southern California and Las Vegas, NV)
AbbVie · Los Angeles, CA · Senior
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
Unmatched or unknown dimensions score exactly the same: 0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.