Senior Associate- Global HEOR, Value Writing
About this opportunity
Career Category
Health Economics
Job Description
Senior Associate: Global HEOR Value Writing
Department: Global Health Economics & Outcomes Research (HEOR)
Job Family: Health Economics
Job Type: Full-Time
Location: Hyderabad, India
Reports To: Global Value Writing Team Lead
Position Summary
The Global HEOR Value Writing Senior Associate plays a critical role in supporting Amgen’s global market access strategy through high-quality Health Technology Assessment (HTA) deliverables. This role collaborates closely with team lead and Global HEOR Product Leads to ensure alignment with product strategy. The Value Writing Senior Associate develops Global Value Dossiers (GVDs), US AMCP dossiers, EU JCA dossiers, early HTA briefing books, reports and scientific publications ensuring content is scientifically rigorous, and will resonate with HTA and payer audiences.
Key Responsibilities
Develop and update Global Value Dossiers (GVDs), US AMCP dossiers, EU JCA dossiers, and early HTA briefing books across multiple therapeutic areas as assigned by team lead
Write clear and scientifically accurate content tailored to HTA/payer needs using evidence from clinical, economic, and real-world studies.
Contribute to HEOR publication execution, including but not limited to development of abstracts, posters, and manuscripts.
Conduct end to end HTA grade SLRs, TLRs, evidence summaries
Assist in the development of training materials and onboarding documents for HEOR writing resources.
Adhere to internal processes and ensure compliance with publication and HTA standards.
Maintain up-to-date knowledge of HTA requirements, payer trends, and value demonstration best practices.
Review and QC work of peers
Contribute to Knowledge sharing sessions
Qualifications
Education
Bachelor’s or Master’s degree in pharmacy, health economics, medicine, public health, life sciences or a related field.
Experience
Years of relevant experience in HEOR, Medical or Regulatory writing in the pharmaceutical, biotech or consulting setting: +3 years for Master’s degree and +5years for Bachelor’s degree.
Demonstrated experience developing value dossiers (GVDs/US AMCP) and supporting HTA submissions.
Experience in synthesizing clinical, economic, and real-world evidence into payer-relevant narratives.
Familiarity with systematic literature reviews and evidence synthesis processes.
Skills & Competencies
Excellent English oral and written communication, with ability to tailor content to different stakeholders.
Proficiency in Microsoft Office Suite (Word, PowerPoint, Excel); experience with reference management software (e.g., EndNote).
Strong project management and organizational skills with the ability to manage multiple priorities and deadlines.
Familiarity with HTA processes, payer evidence requirements, and global reimbursement landscapes.
Knowledge of Good Publication Practice and publication submission process
Innovative use of artificial intelligence to boost efficiency.
Organizational Behaviors
Strong interpersonal and cross-functional collaboration skills.
Proactive, detail-oriented, and solutions-focused.
Comfortable working in a global team across time zones and cultures.
.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Clinical Development role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 186 comparable Senior Clinical Development roles across 34 biopharma companies.
Salary context
41 of 186 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 186 comparable roles
+ 17 more countries
Seniority mix
186 of 186 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
21 of 186 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.