Johnson & Johnson Posted July 2, 2026

[Medtech] Quality Operations Staff, Quality Control (Sukagawa)

Sukagawa, Japan Full time
Quality

Johnson & Johnson is the source of truth for this posting and owns the application process. We surface normalized context and market comparison you won't find on the original listing.

About this opportunity

At Johnson & Johnson, we believe health is everything. Our strength in healthcare innovation empowers us to build a world where complex diseases are prevented, treated, and cured, where treatments are smarter and less invasive, and solutions are personal. Through our expertise in Innovative Medicine and MedTech, we are uniquely positioned to innovate across the full spectrum of healthcare solutions today to deliver the breakthroughs of tomorrow, and profoundly impact health for humanity. Learn more at jnj.com .

As guided by Our Credo, Johnson & Johnson is responsible to our employees who work with us throughout the world. We provide an inclusive work environment where each person is considered as an individual. At Johnson & Johnson, we respect the diversity and dignity of our employees and recognize their merit.

Job Function:

Quality

Job Sub Function:

Customer/Commercial Quality

Job Category:

Professional

All Job Posting Locations:

Sukagawa, Fukushima, Japan

Job Description:

<品質管理業務関連>

社内の多数の製品のうち、能動医療機器(電動医療機器)の受入検査、検査プロセスのマネージメント

検査委託業者の方の管理監督業務

関連部門(国内、及び海外ヨーロッパ拠点)との調整、定期的なコール

新製品導入プロジェクトへの参加、及びプロセスの構築、及び改善

手順書の作成・改訂

品質に関する監査(外部・内部)の準備および対応(年複数回)

短期的な部門戦略・目標設定、進捗管理、業務管理

<その他>

須賀川事業所/CQ戦略的優先課題プロジェクト活動のリード、及び参加

須賀川事業所内委員会活動への参加

<職務経験>

製造、QA/QC、修理、保守業務の経験

GMP、ISO13485又はISO9001に基づいた業務の経験

設計・開発業務の経験

業界経験は、GMPが厳しい医薬品、医療機器、化粧品などが好ましいが、自動車、半導体などの電気系を扱う製造業界経験でも可能

<必要とする能力・スキル>

・英語力(ビジネスレベル以上必須):海外とのテレカンファに日本の代表として出席し、調整交渉ができるレベル、英語での読み書き、資料作成能力

電気に関連する基礎的な知識

薬機法、ISO13485又はISO9001の基礎的な知識

業務の課題・問題点を調査・分析し、全社的視点で改善できる能力

PC関連の基礎(Word, Excel, Outlook, PPTなど)

・多様な考えを受け入れ、新しいこと、変化・変更にチャレンジするマインドセットをお持ちの方

・常に向上心を持ち学習意欲が高い方で、学んだことを実践に繋げることができる方

・高いコミュニケーション能力を持ち、関連部門との良好な関係を構築できる方

・サプライチェーンマネジメント(広義)、品質マネジメント、プロジェクトマネジメントなど

の領域で能力開発意欲の高い方

・改善に対して心理的なハードルがなく、ロジカルシンキングを用いて業務効率化に継続的に取り組める方

<働き方>

基本週5日は事業所勤務、一部の場合、在宅勤務可能

車通勤あり(下道片道2時間以内圏内居住要)

Required Skills:

Preferred Skills:

Audit Management, Business Behavior, Coaching, Compliance Management, Continuous Improvement, Data Analysis, Detail-Oriented, Goal Attainment, Internal Controls, Issue Escalation, Problem Solving, Process Oriented, Quality Control (QC), Quality Management Systems (QMS), Quality Standards, Regulatory Environment

Job details

Seniority
Not listed
Function
Quality
Therapeutic area
Not listed
Location
Sukagawa, Japan
Employment type
Full time

How this role compares

Computed from every other active Quality role in our database, not just this employer's listings.

We currently track 909 comparable Quality roles across 103 biopharma companies.

909Comparable roles tracked
838Currently active
103Companies hiring similar roles
48Countries represented

Salary context

183 of 909 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)

Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.

This roleSubject Not listed on this posting
Lowest disclosed · Technician - QC Laboratory · Lilly $13/hr – $29/hr (≈ $26,998–$60,507/yr)
Highest disclosed · AVP, External Quality · Merck $282,200/yr – $444,200/yr
Peer group range $43,753 – $363,200 (median $142,155)

Where these roles are based

Top locations among the 909 comparable roles

United States317
Ireland55
India51
China44
Japan43
Belgium39

+ 42 more countries

Seniority mix

428 of 909 peers have a known seniority level

Manager155
Senior132
Associate Director40
Director38
Associate27
Principal19
Senior Director11
Intern/Fellow/Postdoc4
Executive/VP2

Therapeutic area mix

1 of 909 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden

Vaccines & Infectious Disease1

Similar opportunities

The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.

40%similar
Gilead Sciences K.K. Tokyo, Japan
Same function Same country
40%similar
Gilead Sciences K.K. Tokyo, Japan Manager
Same function Same country
40%similar
Regeneron Japan KK Tokyo, Japan Manager
Same function Same country
40%similar
BMS Japan Aichi, Japan Director
Same function Same country
40%similar
BMS Japan Otemachi-JP, Japan Manager
Same function Same country
40%similar
BMS Japan Otemachi-JP, Japan Associate Director
Same function Same country

Notify me about similar jobs

Get an email when we spot other openings like this one – same job function, comparable seniority, roles you'd actually want to see.

How we calculate "similar"

No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.

Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.

40%
Specialist, Quality Assurance
Gilead Sciences K.K. · Tokyo, Japan · Seniority not listed
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
40%
Quality Director
BMS Japan · Aichi, Japan · Director
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
40%
【加須】Quality LOC Japan Specialist
GlaxoSmithKline K.K. · East Japan Distribution Center, Japan · Seniority not listed
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
40%
Quality Assurance Manager
Amgen K.K. · Tokyo, Japan · Manager
Function Therapeutic area Seniority Country
Unmatched or unknown dimensions score exactly the same: 0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.