Medical Representative_R&I (South)
About this opportunity
職務說明
透過醫院相關通路，提供處方藥品之專業諮詢服務，並執行銷售任務。
維繫並持續強化客戶關係，反應客戶及市場需求，以確保達到業績目標
資歷 卓越的專家客戶認可的顧問服務與合作夥伴的口碑；卓越的區域內績效目標達成與成長的表現
產品趨勢與競爭對手策略分析能力
具南區（雲林、嘉義）MC/RH之胸腔內科、風濕免疫科經驗，資歷五年以上者尤佳。
具領導跨部門團隊合作來達成策略目標的經歷
自然學科或企管相關學位；藥學、藥理學為佳
具專業的簡報能力
個性活潑親和力佳、積極進取、執行力佳且勇於接受挑戰
Date Posted
03-Jul-2026
Closing Date
30-Oct-2026
AstraZeneca embraces diversity and equality of opportunity. We are committed to building an inclusive and diverse team representing all backgrounds, with as wide a range of perspectives as possible, and harnessing industry-leading skills. We believe that the more inclusive we are, the better our work will be. We welcome and consider applications to join our team from all qualified candidates, regardless of their characteristics. We comply with all applicable laws and regulations on non-discrimination in employment (and recruitment), as well as work authorization and employment eligibility verification requirements.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Sales role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 2393 comparable Sales roles across 138 biopharma companies.
Salary context
636 of 2393 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 2393 comparable roles
+ 59 more countries
Seniority mix
956 of 2393 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
651 of 2393 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.