Global Clinical Operations- Study Start-Up Team Lead
About this opportunity
The SSO Study Start-Up Team Lead is accountable for the governance and oversight of a study start-up team in a standalone country or OPC (operating country). The SSO Study Start-Up Team Lead is supporting the country/OPC SSU strategy and prioritization in close collaboration with SSU/OPC Head and Country/OPC LT to deliver operational excellence of the GDD portfolio in compliance with Novartis processes, ICH/GCP and regulatory requirements.
Key responsibilities: Study Start-Up StrategySupports Study & Site Operations Country Leadership Team to identify innovative practices to optimize country operations and operational excellence, especially in terms of study start-up activities to increase performance, productivity, and business impactSeeks and evaluates external knowledge and best practices to enhance overall operational excellence of country trial operationsSupports country SSU strategy in close collaboration with SSU/OPC Head and Portfolio Head/Portfolio Team Lead(s)Responsible for timely start-up activities from country allocation until site Green Light (ready-to-initiate-sites)Ensures close collaboration with local IRBs/IECs and Health Authorities, as applicableAllocation, initiation and conduct of trialsCollaborates with Head Portfolio, SSO Portfolio Team Leads and global study team (Clinical Operations Program Head, Trial Lead) to ensure SSU timelines and deliverables are met according to country commitmentsAccountable for timelines, accuracy, and quality of TMF documents, including study start-up and ongoing TMF maintenance to ensure TMF inspection readinessEnsures adherence to financial standards, prevailing legislation, ICH/GCP, IRB/IEC, Health Authority and SOP requirementsImplements innovative and efficient processes which are in line with Novartis strategyPeople and resource managementHiring, training, development, and retention of Study Start-Up associatesResource management and reporting of Study Start-Up associatesEnsures associates have the required level of skills to successfully set-up and execute studies with high quality and according to business objectivesManages and oversees productivity targets per defined objectives, and serves as an escalation point for Study Start-Up functionsEssential requirements:A degree in scientific or health discipline requiredFluent in both written and spoken EnglishFluent in both written and spoken country languageMinimum 5 years’ experience in clinical operations and planningProven leadership capabilities and experience (with or without direct line management responsibilities).Understanding of all aspects of clinical drug development with particular emphasis on trial set-up, execution, and monitoringThorough understanding of the international aspects of drug development process, including strong knowledge of international standards (GCP/ICH), health authorities (FDA/EMA), local/national Health Authorities regulations and Novartis standardsStrong capability in working in a global/country matrix environmentDesirable requirements:Proven successful leadership of teams (with or without direct reports), preferably with experience in working with international teamsStrong interpersonal, negotiation and conflict resolution skills Communicates effectively in a local/global matrixed environment
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Clinical Development role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 709 comparable Clinical Development roles across 70 biopharma companies.
Salary context
218 of 709 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 709 comparable roles
+ 30 more countries
Seniority mix
577 of 709 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
154 of 709 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.