District Manager
About this opportunity
职责描述：
领导和发展一组销售专业人员，以实现该区域的业务目标，并管理团队高绩效发展，提高区域客户观念。
管理区域内的销售团队
制定和执行区域销售策略
监控团队绩效并提供指导
与利益相关者建立和维护关系
分析销售数据并识别机会
任职资格
教育背景：具有医学、药学或相关专业，大专及以上学历
工作经验：5年以上制药行业工作经验，1年以上管理经验，过往有较好绩效
具备业务规划、团队管理、沟通协调能关键技能
具备主动进取、自我认知、结果导向，良好的学习敏锐度，韧性，主人翁意识等特质
具备高度的合规意识
Pursue progress , discover extraordinary
Better is out there. Better medications, better outcomes, better science. But progress doesn’t happen without people – people from different backgrounds, in different locations, doing different roles, all united by one thing: a desire to make miracles happen. So, let’s be those people.
At Sanofi, we provide equal opportunities to all regardless of race, colour, ancestry, religion, sex, national origin, sexual orientation, age, citizenship, marital status, ability or gender identity.
Watch our ALL IN video and check out our Diversity Equity and Inclusion actions at sanofi.com !
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Sales role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 436 comparable Manager Sales roles across 63 biopharma companies.
Salary context
85 of 436 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 436 comparable roles
+ 40 more countries
Seniority mix
436 of 436 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
123 of 436 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
Open in 2 locations
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.