Director, Future Field Engagement Strategy – Metrics & Incentives
About this opportunity
#LI-RemoteThis position can be based remotely anywhere in the U.S. (there may be some restrictions based on legal entity). The expectation of working hours and travel (domestic and/or international) will be defined by the hiring manager. This position will require 30% travel.Novartis is unable to offer relocation support for this role: please only apply if this location is accessible to you.Company will not sponsor visas for this position.The Director, Future Field Engagement Strategy – Metrics & Incentives shapes how success is measured and celebrated across Novartis’ evolving commercial organization. This role designs forward‑looking performance metrics and incentive frameworks that align with modern engagement models, emerging field roles, and enterprise priorities. By reinforcing the right behaviors and outcomes, this leader helps inspire field teams while driving sustainable customer impact, growth, and long‑term competitiveness.
Key Responsibilities:Architect and lead future‑ready measurement frameworks that define how Customer Engagement and Go‑to‑Market success are assessed across the enterprise.Translate complex, aggregated performance signals (e.g., claims, prescribing, payer, CRM insights) into clear, strategic measurement constructs.Shape balanced scorecards that intentionally measure both outcomes and critical enterprise behaviors, bringing an outside‑in perspective in close partnership with Insights and Decision Science (IDS).Serve as a strategic advisor to senior leadership by delivering forward‑looking insights on performance trends, risks, and opportunities, alongside Insights and Decision Science.Reimagine incentive compensation strategies to align with evolving field roles, customer archetypes, and modern engagement models.Steward incentive frameworks in partnership with Incentive Compensation teams to ensure they are equitable, transparent, and meaningfully motivating.Continuously evolve metrics and incentives to reflect market dynamics, transformation priorities, and real‑world field feedback, in collaboration with Insights and Decision Science.Partner across Insights and Decision Science, Finance, Field Leadership, and field enablement teams to ensure performance frameworks remain grounded, agile, and operationally impactful.Essential Requirements: Bachelor’s degree required from 4-year college or university.8+ years’ experience in incentive design, performance management, or field operations strategy, within pharmaceutical, biotech, healthcare, or similarly structured industries with large, geographically dispersed teams. We also welcome candidates from other complex environments such as medical devices, diagnostics, life sciences services, insurance, consumer health, or B2B sectors.Deep expertise in incentive compensation strategy, customer engagement metrics, and the levers that drive field performance and motivation.Proven ability to design and scale innovative, data‑driven models that connect enterprise insights with real‑world field execution.Strong fluency in healthcare systems, including payer and provider dynamics, enterprise account management, and evolving technology trends.Demonstrated success influencing senior leaders and aligning cross‑functional stakeholders within complex, matrixed organizations.Exceptional analytical and strategic thinking capabilities, with the ability to synthesize complex data into clear insights, narratives, and action plans.Trusted collaborator and communicator, skilled at building relationships, facilitating alignment, and driving outcomes across functions, geographies, and field teams.Desirable Requirements:Experience working with enterprise incentive compensation platforms and advanced analytics tools, including applying these capabilities to go‑to‑market transformation, evolving engagement models, and new role architectures.Background in consulting or high‑growth environments, with demonstrated success building scalable measurement and incentive constructs across global or multi‑market teams while maintaining fairness, comparability, and strategic coherence.Novartis Compensation Summary:The salary for this position is expected to range between $185,500 and $344,500 per year.The final salary offered is determined based on factors like, but not limited to, relevant skills and experience, and upon joining Novartis will be reviewed periodically. Novartis may change the published salary range based on company and market factors.Your compensation will include a performance-based cash incentive and, depending on the level of the role, eligibility to be considered for annual equity awards.US-based eligible employees will receive a comprehensive benefits package that includes health, life and disability benefits, a 401(k) with company contribution and match, and a variety of other benefits. In addition, employees are eligible for a generous time off package including vacation, personal days, holidays and other leaves.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Sales role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 67 comparable Director Sales roles across 20 biopharma companies.
Salary context
16 of 67 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function and a matching or adjacent seniority level -- not necessarily the same therapeutic area or country.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 67 comparable roles
Seniority mix
67 of 67 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
25 of 67 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.