Analyst, Clinical Trial Transparency, Redaction (12 months fixed-term)
About this opportunity
Location: Warsaw
Model: hybrid 3+2The Clinical Trial Transparency (CTT) team sits within R&D Oncology Regulatory Science Strategy and Excellence (ORSSE) Clinical Trial Transparency Position Globally. CTT is responsible for posting clinical trial information to public websites and prepare clinical documents and data so they can be shared publicly meeting regulatory requirements and company commitments.
The CTT Redaction Analyst will be a specialist in clinical document redactions. They will redact clinical study documents in support of the EU Clinical Trial Regulation (for Clinical Trial Information System postings /CTIS/ and FDAAA801 with Final Rule /for Clinicaltrials.gov postings/ ). The individual is accountable to redact submission ready documents to ensure no personal data or commercially confidential information remains visible. They will support process growth, stability, and improvements in support of delivery of redacted clinical documents to be published on CTIS or on Clinicaltrials.gov.
This role will require an in-depth understanding of how AstraZeneca works to meet associated regulatory policies, privacy, clinical data and documents.
The ideal candidate possesses the following:
An understanding of what is personal information
An understanding of what is commercially confidential information
An understanding of clinical information and essential clinical trial documentation
The ability to deliver quality output consistently
A proven track record in delivering against tasks that require attention to detail and focus
Scientific background is beneficial
An understanding of clinical study lifecycle and an interest to learn about in the documents created during that lifecycle is beneficial
This role will work globally with individual study teams to deliver redacted documents for regulatory submission. This role will NOT manage the submission; they will provide submission ready deliverables to document requestors who will use them for submission needs. The role will be an individual contributor. The successful candidate role models AstraZeneca values and principles and encourages others to do so.
Typical Accountabilities and required competencies
Create Redacted Clinical Documents following established Redaction Guidelines and SOPs. Have knowledge of clinical documents and the clinical study lifecycle. Accountable for good Information Practice on all assigned activities. Maintain high level of understanding of AstraZeneca policies and guidelines used to deliver to the regulatory policies and support protection of personal information. Support development of any training materials when needed in collaboration with direct manager. Ensure adherence to all applicable AstraZeneca requirements, including but not limited to clinical operations, quality, best practices in managing confidential business information, and data privacy. Demonstrate a high focus on quality and the ability to meticulously quality check work delivered. Work with a continuous improvement mindset, looking for opportunities to improve the process and increasing delivery efficiencies as this capability grows. Support and engage study teams to ensure timely delivery of redacted documents in line with the process. Project opening for new requests Provide administrative support for tools used in the process Be a system expert in the use of technology/ tools Contribute to the new technologies/systems/tools development by providing user feedback or participating in testing Support the delivery of all Clinical Trial Transparency activities at AstraZeneca as assigned.
Education, Qualifications, Skills and Experience
Essential
1. Competent verbal and written communication and collaboration skills in English.
2. Diligence – attention to detail and ability to manage a programme of concurrent activities.
3. Concentration on a task with repeatable delivery needs.
4. Understanding of clinical information and basic understanding of clinical trial documentation.
5. Ability to understand and adhere to defined guidelines for identification of personal information accurately and demonstrate application across numerous documents.
6. BSc computer science, business or life sciences.
Desirable
1. Current knowledge of other technical and regulatory requirements relevant to the role.
2. Good understanding of Global Medicines Development.
3. Basic understanding of what it means to identify something as company confidential information (CCI).
4. Adobe Acrobat software experience and understanding
Date Posted
05-sie-2026
Closing Date
17-sie-2026
AstraZeneca embraces diversity and equality of opportunity. We are committed to building an inclusive and diverse team representing all backgrounds, with as wide a range of perspectives as possible, and harnessing industry-leading skills. We believe that the more inclusive we are, the better our work will be. We welcome and consider applications to join our team from all qualified candidates, regardless of their characteristics. We comply with all applicable laws and regulations on non-discrimination in employment (and recruitment), as well as work authorization and employment eligibility verification requirements.
Job details
How this role compares
Computed from every other active Clinical Development role in our database, not just this employer's listings.
We currently track 709 comparable Clinical Development roles across 70 biopharma companies.
Salary context
218 of 709 peers report a salary range (USD, annualized)
Peers share this role's job function. This posting doesn't list a seniority level, so peers aren't narrowed by seniority either -- the range below may span more levels than usual.
Where these roles are based
Top locations among the 709 comparable roles
+ 30 more countries
Seniority mix
577 of 709 peers have a known seniority level
Therapeutic area mix
154 of 709 peers have a known therapeutic area; the rest are genuinely unlabeled, not hidden
Similar opportunities
The closest matches from our peer group, ranked by how similar they are, not how well you'd qualify for them -- treat this as market context, not a guaranteed shortlist; a weak match is labeled as one below.
How we calculate "similar"
No black box, no LLM guesswork: a deterministic score built from four normalized attributes. Here's this role's own peer group at different match levels, so you can see the mechanism, not just the result.
Every comparison starts from the same 100-point budget: 25 for working in the same function, 40 for the same therapeutic area, 20 for the same or adjacent seniority, 15 for the same country. A dimension we can't confirm on both sides contributes nothing, never a guess, never a free pass.
0 points, never a partial guess. A role we know almost nothing about beyond its function bottoms out at 25%; it never inflates to 100% just because there's little to compare against. Seniority uses a defined ladder (Associate → Manager → Associate Director → Senior → Principal → Director → Senior Director → Executive/VP) so "Director" and "Senior Director" count as adjacent, but "Director" and "Executive/VP" do not.